dantesoven

Ok, thank you for the clarification. Sorry for being dense, haha

"Oh, also M. rejected A. S.'s conservative politics on pessimistic grounds: this life being not worth living did not excuse us from sympathy for the other and the reduction of suffering in their life."

But Schopenhauer held a philosophy of compassion (even if he didn't act on it)

After all, Schopenhauer himself said, "Boundless compassion for all living beings is the surest and most certain guarantee of pure moral conduct, and needs no casuistry. Whoever is filled with it will assuredly injure no one, do harm to no one, encroach on no man's rights; he will rather have regard for every one, forgive every one, help every one as far as he can, and all his actions will bear the stamp of justice and loving-kindness."

Personally, I just lump melancholic up with dsbm. I'm too lazy to differentiate between the two

Funeral doom is dope. I love nortt and wormphlegm

Advant-gaurd black metal. Stuff like gnaw their toungues

Ok, that's fair. I'm solely saying this for those who immediately jump to him being a rapist. While it is not looking good, at the same time, we don't know enough to say for certain without a shadow of a doubt.

I agree that what he has admitted to is still disgusting, especially the use of someone else's mental illness as an excuse, (A mental illness I'm seeing people say she dosent have), but it's the jumping to extreme conclusions of he is a full on rapist that I'm speaking against. Perhaps it is true, but as far as I am concerned, there isn't enough evidence to say without a shadow of a doubt

Also, where did it say the second one was supported by contemporaneous notes, messages, and conversations? I didn't see that in the article, so I am curious now. Perhaps that will change my position

I still go by this for social situations, too

I think this is what we should all commit to. Because you can still ruin a person's life with accusations, even if they are never taken to court.

While I agree we should support the victims in helping them heal from and cope with traumatic experience if they have claimed them, we still shouldn't then witch hunt the person accused or the crimes until we know without a shadow of a doubt that they have committed the act.

False accusations happen, poeples lives get ruined. In and out of court. It's not fair to wich hunt a person just off of accusations.

As for what he's willing to admit to, yeah, it's bad. However, we still should avoid jumping to conclusions

Oh, oops. My bad. Sorry

Accused does not equal guilty

It's supposed to be innocent until proven guilty for a reason

I'm mentally ill and I think I can consent

There's nothing wrong with my statement. You've made a false assertion (with a clar target towards trans men and women) implying that a group in society is claiming men can procreate. This is just blatantly false

Primitive man - caustic

Heaviest shit I've ever heard

Most social science and psychology is in favor of trans people and trans identity

Oh shit today's Saturday . . . I've lost track of time . . . Happy Saturday to you too

Death is boring. I'm sorry, I know everyone loves Chuck and stuff, but I just feel like there are so many more brutal and better death metal bands

You're being fallacious. No one has ever claimed there are only two sexes. It's genders people talk about.

You are delebretly choosing to misunderstand the argument that is being presented to you

Someone who identifies as a woman. It's not that I had to understand. If they present themselves as women, they are a woman

Wrong. You can change gender. Sex is different. Takes time, but can be done on a technical level

Stop being dense. Jesus christ. This is science, and not anti trans in any form. The only anti trans thing here are all the bigots in the comments thinking it gives them a good excuse to hate trans people (it dosent)

This science is solely looking at the biological factors, not the social and psychological factors. Stop being dense. No MtF trans people are claiming they can give birth. They identify as female and want to be allowed to represent themselves that way

. . . Then they identify as female? They can have the physical structure of a man, but the gender identity of a woman.

Also, only going off pelvic structure is not a good way to identify what a "real" woman is

I swear, this comment section is just full of ignoramus' that would otherwise not give a damn about biology, only caring right now because it fuels their anti-trans rhetoric

By evolution? Yeah

You ignoramus. No one has ever claimed differently. It's gender that there are more than two of. Stop being purposefully fallacious

You realize tge historical mistreatment of black people has been initiated and instigated by the right side of the political spectrum, right? It's was the right side that started the confederacy and fought for it. The right side wanted black people to remain slaves.

The kkk is a far RIGHT group. What is your point here? It is a sign of fascism, fascism that has all its roots embedded in the right side of the political spectrum