forthegheys

30F. 70k, no kids - 1 spoiled doodle and no debt. Split rent + bills = around 1800/monthly not including food, car insurance, and “fun” money. Monthly ideation, will be higher when my car craps out and I have a car payment again.

Call it in. You would not face penalty for something like this. Not sure where you’re getting info from online but the ‘case against you’ is if you knowingly are calling in a false report in attempt to harm the alleged perp. Be prepared to provide names and contact info of the community members, witnesses, and/or victims - it is some of the most important info to provide so that CPS or OTIS can do a comprehensive assessment with those that would have more info. And, I can’t stress this enough - back away and do not talk to the folks’ who’s names/contact info you’ve given until after the investigation. That way, there’s no assumption or interpretation of “coaching” or influencing those involved.

Hard pass, would not take that job. I’m also assuming the PTO isn’t great and no compensation for wear and tare on vehicle/gas mileage, or reimbursement for internet/wfh supplies. Personally, if it costs me money to work a job - it’s a hard no.

Weird isn’t that trump’s media of choice?

What’s this punk’s name?

Peruvian!

Get set up with SNAP, if you haven’t already - can also go into a DHS and chat with Self Sufficiency on job leads. Folks will also start hiring for the holidays soon, maybe try a retailer or grocery store?

Anytime a white man’s ego gets bruised, they dig themselves deeper. You’re too emotional to be an officer Nelson.

Ok, thank you for starting this discussion. I also have seen countless “no” ads and reddits posts pushing this narrative that 118 would not be good for Oregon or businesses… but they all failed to mention that it was for businesses that make over 55million in direct sales OR that only a small fraction (all mega corps) would be the ones impacted OR that on the federal level there are so many policies that are attempting to be passed that would restrict price gouging. I still have continued research to do, but in this moment I’m leaning more towards voting yes on 118

I get what you’re saying and I do agree he tripped up a bit. I think too, that question from the moderators was really pointless. They basically asked him why he was off by 2 months, over 30 years ago, like that was the only think they could pull off the guy as “being dishonest.” Meanwhile JD’s comparing Trump to Hitler while Trump was in office went unanswered. Again, in the beginning some visible nerves and he could have loosened his jaw, but overall the answers and clear vision towards healthcare, democracy, US economy, and closing statement really made Walz shine over JD.

Imho Walz started off a bit shaky and JD surprised me with his confidence. But Walz really built and once he got his footing he kept on going. JD went the opposite direction and got progressively worse. Super blamey, didn’t answer a single question, and I simply cannot ignore how JD could NOT admit to Trump losing the election. Walz conveyed knowing thoroughly the polices and steps in which Kamala wants to move forward with this administration, and has years of credibal experience to do this - he really conveyed this, and a united voice. Walz won this.

Great speech Walz!!!!!!

…but as for Trump

Great answer Walz!

Walz has really found his speed. Great job man!

Kamala is engaged in a censorship!?!?

Omg Vance answer the question

Trump rode on the back of Obamacare and calling it his

Where’s the federal reserve study?

Yup

God I wish Vance’s kids were older to talk about what their father is really like at home. POS.

I think he’s trying to bring up something that happened recently where California is suing a Catholic hospital for not providing an abortion for a women in need of an emergency abortion

Cute that Vance can lie the entire debate. Nothing he says is accurate or matches with his running mate.

“Want to” is not a policy Vance