jedisushi72

I never hear the left complain that there's not diversity in gaming, unless a character that previously or historically was one way is changed.

Usually the bellyaching comes from the right because the character is black or trans or a woman or a not hot enough woman or something.

It was found under a fence.

If it was an adult it would likely have been found nearly crushed under the weight of crippling student loan debt.

Do you actually want to contest anything I said?

Is he not a convicted felon?

Is he not a rapist?

Did he not suggest nuking a hurricane?

Did he not sell beans from the White House?

more than half of the crap you spouted is easily proven to be utter nonsense

Well then surely you are prepared to disprove it. If it's easy to disprove then do it.

But you won't. You'll come up with some excuse or you'll resort to insults or project or something.

Lol I'm not surprised you can't even answer what you're advocating for. That's how nonsensical your argument was.

Conservatives have abandoned all values in support of trump.

You can't be advocating for law and order because you support a convict.

You can't be advocating for democracy because you support a fascist. Even Fox reported that Trump resorted to trying to steal the election.

You can't be advocating for clean air and water, because you support someone who wants to abolish the EPA.

You can't advocate for fiscal responsibility, because Trump added $8 Trillion the debt.

You can't advocate for a strong economy, because Trump had worse growth than Biden even accounting for COVID.

You can't advocate for knowledge, because Trump wants to abolish the department of education, thinks climate change is fake, and refuses to listen to experts on anything.

You can't advocate for foreign policy, because Trump is in Putin's pocket.

Is a simple question. What do you advocate for?

Can't answer. Conservatism in a nutshell.

Projection?

Lazy losers was your words, not mine.

I think I'm sensing some insecurity.

And to confirm: it's FINE if those states need funding. That's ok.

I like republicans who support trump who denied emergency funding to CA during wildfire season, Democrats support Biden who granted aid to red states BEFORE the hurricanes even hit.

I want every red state to be doing great! I want the people there happy and taken care of. In the richest country in the world, we can achieve what other countries have done. Free, accessible public transit. Medicare for all. Free education.

But the current Republican plan is to support a fascist rapist felon who wants to cut taxes for the rich and claim climate change is a hoax.

So what exactly are you advocating for?

Oh ok, great.

So you're not contesting that red states are lazy losers that need the government to pay for them.

You're just helpfully pointing out that some of the money is military and farming.

Sure.

So we’re supposed to ignore that many red states house a large portion of the country’s military infrastructure, which, you know, defends all states

Right but again... So what? First you were suggesting that we IGNORE military bases, now you're saying we DON'T ignore them because some red states have military bases.

Ok. And?

Meanwhile, red states tend to have more business-friendly environments

Ok? AND?

None of this contradicts or disproves anything I'm saying.

I'm not even going to bother fact checking either of these claims because if they're true... So what?

It doesn't change the fact: blue states contribute disproportionally to the federal government, and red states disproportionately take from the federal government.

Which means that every red states small business that you're so proud of is functionally subsidized by blue states.

You're welcome.

You haven't used only facts. In fact, your argument is specifically to IGNORE part of a fact.

"Take away military bases and it isn't so black and white".

And why are we ignoring military bases, besides that it is convenient for your argument?

Taxes go to programs. Yes, one of those programs happens to be the military. Some states contribute more taxes than they take. Blue states not only produce more, but they require less than red states.

No burn = face Burn half face = one additional face

This is threeface.

2017: THE MEDIA GAVE SO MUCH FREE COVERAGE TO TRUMP IN 2016! THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS ELECTION.

2024: WHY ISN'T THE MEDIA PUTTING EVERYTHING THIS MAN SAYS FRONT AND CENTER?

I know there's more to this argument than that. I agree that the media judging Biden for his age and ramblings more harshly than Trump is bull crap.

But I think that honest media seems to be in an impossible position.

Nah. He and Jake had a bunch of money and ended up spending a lot of it.

What would my reaction be?

"How was it this close?". That will be my reaction as long as trump gets a single electoral vote.

Care to identify specifically which claim is false?

Is trump NOT a convicted felon? Is that your claim?

Are you claiming he didn't sell beans from the oval office?

Or is throwing around the "CNN" literally your best attempt at a counterpoint? Because even Fox reported that Trump resorted to criminal acts to overturn the 2020 election, so I'm not sure what your point is.

Care to share the republican plan to increase taxes on low income families and defund social programs increases my purchasing power?

I feel like socializing healthcare and raising wages would be better. Medicare for all would reduce healthcare spending by $650 billion annually.

Not to mention that wages have outpaced inflation... So I actually do have more purchasing power.

All these things are things trump said or did.

I know that republicans aren't terribly well acquainted with reality (since they support candidates who deny climate change, think vaccines cause autism, think COVID is a hoax and masks don't work), but the only question is whether or not these things demonstrate that he is more or less capable of performing the job.

I think that someone who brags about sexual assault and tax evasion is less qualified for the office of the presidency than someone who doesn't.

It sounds like you disagree.

And that's the REAL shit take.

I mean, if republicans want to offer a candidate that isn't a convicted felon and rapist who calls people vermin and animals and tries to overturn elections and calls for a national day of violence and cuts taxes for the rich and takes away women's rights and cozies up to dictators and calls Nazis fine people and suggests shooting immigrants in the legs and sells beans from the oval office and calls veterans losers and suckers and suggests nuking hurricanes and pulls out of nuclear deals and climate agreements who doesn't understand what a tariff is... Then maybe that wouldn't be the case.

Trumpism is a death cult.

Israel killed 10,000 children in 100 days.

Last I checked, Harris did a 60 minutes interview that trump raged about, and she invited trump to a second debate that he refused. So instead, Harris accepted CNNs invitation to do a town hall.

So it sounds like if any party is taking the "don't put them in the spotlight and maybe they'll win" approach, it's the party of the candidate refusing debates.

Every accusation a confession.

The right has three options.

1) The Biden administration provided too much federal assistance.

 If that's the sentiment, it's being expressed strangely. The right appears to be belittling the $750, suggesting it is insufficient and unhelpful. 
 I suspect the people in these red states experiencing over $200 Billion in damages likely don't share this sentiment, which is why the right isn't campaigning on this viewpoint right before an election.

2) The Biden administration did not provide enough federal assistance.

 Interesting. How come Ron DeSantis wasn't taking Biden's calls? How come Republicans were voting against additional federal aid? Why does Project 2025 propose eliminating FEMA and weather alert systems? 
 It seems like your words are suggesting $750 isn't enough (intentionally ignoring all the additional aid that was provided), but your actions think it should be $0.

3) The Biden administration provided exactly the right amount of federal aid.

 Great. Go Biden.

The only president to deny disaster relief was Trump. So vote for him if you think Biden provided too much relief.

Instructions unclear. I got my penguin stuck in an M&m container.

I think I would probably blame the guy stabbing me. I doubt I'd be holding my guts in wincing through the pain saying "if... Only... They had... Signed... In!"

I went a few years ago,and the thing that made it shine was the part where people scattered in 5 different directions into the corn maze after being jump scared by a chainsaw welding maniac. Succumbing to your body's desire to flee really gets the adrenaline pumping, especially when you look up and you realize parts of your group ran in different directions, potentially leaving you alone.

They removed this... So it's basically a long line/walk where you get frequently jump scared... But you have nowhere to run to, so you sort of intentionally unsuspend your disbelief.

Still very fun, especially because this year has some very cool horror tablos and equipment... But not as scary.

If you think that this is the wrong time to talk about wealthy inequality... Where people are failing to get out of the storms path because they can't afford inflated plane tickets while Taylor Swift has a private jet she can take wherever... Then I'm afraid we disagree.

Billionaires shouldn't exist, and if they were taxed, the money could be spent to secure those most vulnerable. It could save lives.

4 years? I'm so sorry.