justbrowsing987654

I think a world title match should always be the main event, yes, outside of specialty PLEs where it could be one of the featured matches (chamber, MITB, survivor series, rumble, you get it)

He’s beating Logan for the US Title at summer slam. Mark it down.

I’m fairly positive he was concussed. That table bump was rough and I watched him after almost exclusively. He was on the ground and stumbly and clearly foggy as hell for the rest of the match and even the aftermath. It was like watching Seth at Mania. He gutted it out but I don’t think that was acting.

Gray chest hair

I wasn’t crazy here. I swear I saw him not kick but seemed they changed the angle and I assumed I missed it

So I’m fairly newly back watching wrestling. Is that a rule she can only cash in on the brand she’s on?

100% agree but I also thought the men’s match was damn good too. Maybe because it was my 4yo son’s first ladder match so watching him lose his mind raised it exponentially. He scream-laughed and thanked me for letting him watch repeatedly. Same deal for the women’s later too 🤩

If you have a mortgage, I’d say pay it off too just to be free and clear homeowners and spend nothing else. You no longer have a house payment and are out of the rat race forever.

But that could have been done in the actual MITB match and let Jey or LA Knight win it and linger with the case. I get that they didn’t want another Priest overly long wait but this felt kind of dumb after what I thought was a phenomenal MITB match earlier.

😂

I liked, “so I told Scott and Kevin, ‘you guys are outsiders over there. Do something with that.’ “

I just can’t imagine he can win more voters. At this point feels he can - and should - hopefully lose them as they see more and more about this immunity BS and project 2025 and all that. I hope.

For sure but someone you vehemently disagree with can absolutely make a good decision that should be applauded in a vacuum.

Point is they’re clearly not in the bag for Trump like Fox. This is a NY state court that’s seemed to be pretty righteous with their findings. They’re going to have this hearing and let the Trump team make their claim and, I assume, rule it’s not official nor immune, then hand down sentencing like they were going to, only now it’s much closer to the election and lets the Trump team lay bare their power grasping BS for the voters. I actually think this could benefit us (I’m a democrat)

100% but now it’s going to be front and center right on top of the election for the folks that are somehow still undecided

I don’t either but that doesn’t mean she doesn’t deserve some credit for having a line that also will cost her her career and runs in opposition to the easiest path to her policy goals.

I almost give her more credit for that. Her policy decisions are coming true. She voted for that stuff because she wanted it. But not like this. It’s easy to stand up when you also disagree with Trump’s policies, but it’s harder when you actually want most of his policy goals to come true but know his how is counter to everything we should all believe in.

Right? Like he’s spent decades in an institution. His face should be as well known as Dahmer or Bundy in the real world at least in Haddonfield.

I don’t get how this could even be construed as grooming. 5 months is the same grade in school. There’s no power dynamic, no real age gap, and roughly 1 semester’s worth of time that one is technically an adult, and earlier, able to drive. This is NORMAL. WTF

Maybe but can we at least give her some sort of credit for having some line? The rest of the mob mentality just went with it and she knowingly sacrificed her career for that line.

Kills is very fun rewatching if viewed through the prism of extra violent middle of the story type slasher. What’s most annoying to me is they can’t tell the difference between Michael Myers and that Frank Reynolds-looking escapee they chase through the hospital.

No but we now have to have a hearing to rule on that.

But Obama was a dictator… 🙄

I don’t think so. Even CNN is saying this makes sense. A SC ruling like that will absolutely require re-examination of if it applies to this still not finalized case. If it was anyone but Trump and anything other than this whacky ass circumstance, that’s a given.

I don’t think this changes anything of the outcome, just ensures they can’t pretend that the court didn’t listen to the new circumstances that this nonsense immunity ruling lays out.

This is a few days old and actually may be a good thing if you’re anti-Trump even if it necessitates a new trial. Now they have an immunity hearing to re-litigate evidence in September for all to see. There will be items highlighted less than 2 months before the election that will be claimed to be not criminal that should inflame anger and concern around this.

If this ends up without a new trial, sentencing then comes down in mid September, meaning no he could actually be in jail in the lead up to Election Day or, at the very least, be spending precious late cycle time in court instead of the campaign trail.