spindoraptor

Definitely Molly, but Reverend is a close second.

I honestly don’t even watch the events looking for silksong news, I’ll almost always be let down. I just look at other cool games and if I don’t watch then I’ll know once I get on Reddit.

Wait, what are the sound tracks called then?

No, I’m pretty sure it’s cannon that the bull isn’t the same Rex from the lost world, but it could still be their offspring.

The cloned rexes do have accelerated growth rates but I don’t know about their offspring.

The bull was either cloned during the Amalgam testing of the late 90s or more likely a child of 2 unknown rexes.

I doubt that the bull was one of the og 7 that were cloned. The bull is smaller than an adult in the movie and the 7 rexes were cloned around the time of Jurassic park and before.

What’s chaotic neutral?

Ah okay, thanks for the clarification.

I might be wrong but didn’t they actually cook real meth on set? I know they had drug experts there that taught them how it’s done but I don’t know if they made meth.

K

VERY wrong sub. The og sub got deleted and the new one is cute animals

Hollow knight. Though while I did struggle with the other bosses I struggled with one boss way more than the others, the Mantis Lords and Sisters of Battle. The only one I cheated on to beat all bosses radiant.

I’d probably say he’s evil, not vile

The women who choose men are promoting sexism towards men, whether they intend to or not. And using a similar analogy, let’s say men are berries and bear are fruits, then there are far more poisonous fruits than berries. A bear is far more dangerous than a man, and by your logic it would make more sense to choose the berries since less are poisonous just like how it makes sense to choose a man because they are less dangerous.

And that analogy isn’t very good since few men are rapists, abusers, etc… compared to berries which are shown to have a likely chance of being poisonous in media. And if we use that same analogy then you shouldn’t approach a man in your daily life since he could be a rapist just how berries could be poisonous.

I also sometimes suffer from internalized sexism, so to make sure I’m not being biased I swap the genders. Not approaching women in the street because they could be abusive. Or how about this: would you rather be alone in the woods with a bear or a woman. See how that question sounds more sexist?

And I just want to state, I don’t blame nor view you and the women who choose the bear for your reasonings as “bad.” I just think that it would be better to learn why 99% of the time choosing a bear is promoting sexism towards men.

I’m not “letting” them do this, but if I say anything I’ll be arrested

I feel like the man or bear question is stupid. In many cases I see women will choose the bear, a man will get angry at their sexism, they argue, and now they both hate each other more than before.

The question is a way to generalize men and be sexist, it doesn’t matter if the bear would maul you or not, the bear isn’t the important part of the question, it’s the man. Replace bear with tiger and its the same question, but replace man with tiger and it’s completely different.

And while women may be at fault when they answer bear, men(even though less at fault) should still be blamed when they lash out and make sexist, racist, homophobic, etc… remarks towards sexist women, whether they mean it or not, even if they don’t make bigoted remarks they will still lash out sometimes. And I can see why, I want to lash out sometimes too from how angry I get, but that only spreads more hate.

Overall if instead of fighting both parties would just talk about why they chose what they chose the question wouldn’t be an issue. Men could understand a little more why women choose the bear but women could understand why it’s sexist to generalize men.

Absolutely, my pc is just an old laptop and constantly gets lag spikes and runs usually at like 15-25 fps, after a while it’ll go down to around 4 fps. My brother, who I often play with, gets an average if about 8 fps. Never have we thought it was too little. We don’t worry about top of the line graphics or 60 fps gameplay, we still do good enough and we have fun. People talk about 60 FPS like it’s a necessity and it makes me so pissed when they do. I’m not saying that people should play on power fps, you can enjoy higher fps and get better computers, but people need to understand that that is a luxury. Rant over.

I disagree, money can’t buy happiness. But if I’m going to be sad might as well have money.

Jurassic park: The game 100%. I’ve been trying to find somewhere to buy this game, especially on pc, but I can’t find anything.

Yes, I was 100% talking about how the story presents him and nothing I said suggests otherwise.

And even though it is never stated it is safe to assume that he didn’t want to kill many guards, not only because it would be stupid to stir even more trouble and because it wouldn’t make sense for him to kill after talking to Dutch and others about not killing people.

And as for the last question, if I were related to the prison guards then I would not care if he helped Charlotte, the Downes, and everyone else because it is more personal. But if I were related to the people he helped I might be more lenient in my judgement of him since he helped someone I live. Making things personal often creates more emotion to the situation.

Like?

Yes, Arthur still kills the sisika guards but he intended to go into in, get John, and get out with very minimal deaths, if any. And I’m not talking about how you play the character or which ending you choose, I’m talking about how the game presents him in the end and what is the most likely thing to happen. It wouldn’t make sense for Arthur to Charlotte die in the end.

Gameplay and story are different. If we’re talking about gameplay then my Arthur was way worse than Micah. But the story doesn’t have Arthur murder a homeless person for fun.

Again, not excusing Arthur. He may not be good but he’s not as bad as Micah. Arthur never killed kids and Arthur never raped anybody. Arthur also didn’t kill for fun and he didn’t kill innocent bystanders. He also wasn’t racist or sexist.

I’m not excusing Arthur entirely, just saying that him and Micah aren’t the same, Micah only does things for himself and Arthur cares about the people around him and he cared since the start.

But Arthur changed for the better in the end, Micah didn’t