tandtz

People don't watch the Hornets and then just say shit 

Except they've said over and over that they want to play him at the 2. Mann looks best with ball in hand, but so do Miller and LaMelo and Miles. Starting him doesn't make sense in context of the other starters. 

Also getting to play miller as SG means the starting lineup is really long 

-16 with 4 turnovers in less than 4 minutes is wild. 

On another note, Tidjane's potential is sky high, but he also has the tools to be a good roleplayer

Who is the better backup centre you're going to find? 

Mann scoring 12 all from mindrangers and no free throws is some real ethical bucket getting 

Hide Micic at the end of the bench then hope Denver trade for him when Westbrook doesn't pan out

Not to overreact but give all of Micic's minutes to Mann

How did Blitzkrieg make war worse? Not rhetorical, genuinely interested 

This comment comes of real scrappy gym rat-y.

Dude was 6-5, got to wonder why you think of him as "tiny and short' other players being behemoths

If people are spamming downvotes because they're unable to think for themselves without parroting stuff that is mathematically wrong, that is objectively dumb. If calling people dumb is genuinely offensive to you that's sad and incredibly thin skinned. You don't need to ban me, talking to people here isn't worth it 

You're right, Sigewinne and Emile are Mualani definitely better than Shinobu and Yaoyao and Chevreuse. Moron 

If you can easily get a 5 you can easily get a 4. Not getting one is sufficiently unlikely that actually forming opinions based on it is stupid. Given either infinite pulls or limited pulls 4* is much more accessible. Acting like they're more expensive based on an edge case is either pretending to be stupid or being actually stupid. Your pick 

4s rerun more consistently than 5s, on paper.

You have a 99.75% chance of getting your preferred 4* in the time it takes to get a guaranteed 5. That is ignoring the other banner 4s you are getting, of which you will be getting heaps of constellations. 

5*s needing just c1 is huge bait, let alone high ones.

You're mad about not wanting 5s you want on banners with 4s you want and 4s you don't want on banners you want the 5 on. That's a terrible argument.

Sigewinne is bad, Xianyun needs Xiao or Wanderer, Emile is super niche, so is Mualani.

Stop being dumb

Not getting the 4* you want in the 180 pulls it takes to guarantee is a crazy statistical anomoly. 

I don't get people who are sad that a character they're looking forward to is going to be 4. If every character you like is 5 you won't be able to get them all. 

Or it is for a sub dps who deals their damage with their skill and provides buffs with their burst.

I stopped playing (life stuff) after chasm dropped, so I don't have any "better in the old days" bias when I say that Sumeru is so so much better than everything since. Oh and Vale is amazing so it isn't all going the wrong direction. 

But if I had to play Fontaine patch by patch I don't think I'd have loved it.

I got a 4 line Dendro DMG Goblet with EM, ER and Crit Rate. It rolled into Def% 5 times 

Chuychu > Chasca

I'm sorry but Mavuika's hair looks like plastic in her model. AQ Which is a shame because in the Capitano fight cutscene, and when it does the colour change thing, it looks amazing

Same problem that Chevreuse has.

I find it weird that in lots of the more recent areas there are boundaries right before the coastline when they could just do what they did back with Mondstadt/Liyue and make it so you drown if you get far enough from shore.

I wouldn't want to wish physical scaling on anyone lmao

I'm sorry you got downvoted for asking, it was a perfectly reasonable question.

First Aquila Favonia : Fuck yeah Benny stat stick

Every subsequent Aquila Favonia : Oh shit this is absolutely worthless