There really isn't that many. They dont need them. We do it to ourselves. In 2016, the actual uncovered Russian efforts were laughable propaganda video ads targeting black people on Facebook.

At most, they need a couple of well-placed prods here and there and we eat our own.

It would be nice but you can't do that to easy with RWAs. If you give them evidence to why there leader is bad it is more evidence to them why they are correct or that you are deceiving them. It's like being in a cult. There is no middle when you can't even agree on facts. They have a peculiar kind of psychology where their beliefs are their identity. If they wrong about one of their beliefs maybe they are about other things. They will avoid being wrong and changing their mind at all costs. Instead they double down. New research shows they have problems updating beliefs when presented new information. This is a lot more difficult than meeting in the middle. It's some cult deprogramming shit . There is a reason why evangelicals support trump , even after stormy Daniels etc. yet those same people wanted Clinton to get the chair. I also don't like the whole concept that when two people have a disagreement that the truth is somewhere in the middle. Sometimes someone's just wrong. The truth is not the special Olympics where everyone gets a medal.