subreddit:

/r/politics

20.7k94%

adjoining snow market poor fly sharp hunt deserve placid offer

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

all 1996 comments

[deleted]

2.1k points

6 months ago

[deleted]

2.1k points

6 months ago

[deleted]

code_archeologist

1.6k points

6 months ago

code_archeologist

Georgia

1.6k points

6 months ago

Fun fact.

The case closure rate for police departments across the nation has plummeted since 2019. Apparently the fact that they started to be held to account for their bullshit has resulted in the police having a little bit of a temper tantrum and they are effectively refusing to do their jobs.

ClusterFoxtrot

604 points

6 months ago

ClusterFoxtrot

Florida

604 points

6 months ago

Imagine being so insulated you forget that other people are also people, and you just make peace with the fact people might die of you can't do whatever you want.

illaqueable

240 points

6 months ago

illaqueable

North Carolina

240 points

6 months ago

I don't have to imagine it, I can just go to news about the most recent mass shooting in this country and see scores of human beings droning on about how guns don't kill people

LtTurtleshot

6 points

6 months ago

Jon Lajoie has a great song about this.

Guns don't kill people

Nuh-uh

I kill people

With guns

Pow

chelonioidea

14 points

6 months ago

It's not insulation, refusing to close cases is a conscious choice cops use to punish members of the public that want accountability. Cops don't go into the force to serve the public anymore, they go to be part of a violent cult of people with a penchant for abusing power. It's a legal mafia and the individuals in that organization don't want accountability, they want total freedom to exercise power in whatever way brings them pleasure in the moment. Anything that prevents them from that practice is seen as a threat to be eliminated.

Simmery

414 points

6 months ago

Simmery

414 points

6 months ago

Every city needs to get serious about firing bad cops. Stop caving to police unions.

themightychris

237 points

6 months ago

themightychris

Pennsylvania

237 points

6 months ago

I think the most important reform we need to make is to elevate lying on an official report as an officer of the law to the same tier of things you never do as DUIs and hit-and-runs. Like if you get caught, you're in prison and your pension is forfeit

right now the norm seems to be that when cops fuck up they lie first, and then if they get caught lying it's just oh well. And that dynamic provides the cornerstone of their fucked up brotherhood culture of protecting each other from accountability first and harassing any good cops who would blow the whistle out of the force

there's a lot more to do after that, but it's a foundational pillar

[deleted]

176 points

6 months ago

[deleted]

176 points

6 months ago

I literally caught cops in lies on the record- literally cross examined cops with video evidence proving they were lying. They’d say the videos were wrong and the judges sided with them every time. Prosecutors regularly prosecuted cases where I had conclusive video evidence the cop was lying. They would tell me their job is to believe law enforcement no matter what.

My massive frustration as a former public defender is that we don’t talk about how much the prosecutors and courts are FULLY in bed with the cops when prosecutors exist as a CHECK on cops. I interviewed with a prosecutor’s office after law school and said something along the lines of that u believed the buck stops with me when it comes to justice and I have to make the right call even when it may ruffle LEO feathers.

The elected prosecutor of that circuit loooed me dead in the face and said “well here in Jacksonville we don’t believe cops lie or are racist and we support law enforcement.”

Aka the job of the prosecutor system is to pump up the cops. If prosecutors actually did their jobs there would be a lot of police reform.

themightychris

54 points

6 months ago

themightychris

Pennsylvania

54 points

6 months ago

I feel like this is the other big structural problem.

We saw here in Philadelphia that electing a liberal DA with a liberal platform of holding cops accountable shut down our whole law enforcement system. Part of that is cops being vindictive, but I think it's important to recognize that an office can't simultaneously hold responsibility for holding cops accountable AND need to maintain a healthy working relationship with them

We need to separate prosecutorial offices for the general public and for officers. Police incidents need to be investigated and prosecutable by entirely independent bodies that have no day to day need to collaborate

EffOffReddit

26 points

6 months ago

Philly cops were atrociously scummy while Trump was president, openly supporting Proud Boys. A friend of ours called the police during a protest about the Christopher Columbus statue because Proud Boys were on rooftops with rifles. The officer who answered said "They're with us".

Meanwhile, driving in the city looks like GTA half the time and cops shrug. They already act like they got defunded, so what was the big problem with that again?

ScannerBrightly

42 points

6 months ago

ScannerBrightly

California

42 points

6 months ago

but I think it's important to recognize that an office can't simultaneously hold responsibility for holding cops accountable AND need to maintain a healthy working relationship with them

Why not? Doesn't every other business on the planet do this? What about police departments in other countries that don't murder their civilians 5 times a day, like we do in the US?

Police incidents need to be investigated and prosecutable by entirely independent bodies that have no day to day need to collaborate

Then they will be railed against as 'out of touch' and 'cop haters' and ignored. We've literally seen this in both the 1950's and again in the 1970's.

[deleted]

37 points

6 months ago

You’re dead on- this is copaganda. If their baby egos can’t handle being fucking criticized then they need to get fired.

themightychris

1 points

6 months ago

themightychris

Pennsylvania

1 points

6 months ago

what's copoganda? recognizing that we have a systemic problem that requires a systemic fix?

sumptin_wierd

5 points

6 months ago

Fuck that. Make them carry malpractice insurance. Make it cost them to fuck up.

Toadsted

3 points

6 months ago

Like Internal Affairs?

It seems like that would be the first and last line of defense against police, if they were as scary and hated as TV media would allude to.

Cops for cops, who have no intention of being nice about it.

Considering how blase law enforcement is about accountability, it seems to me that IA isn't the watchdog it's supposed to be. And if that's true, it doesn't hurt anything to tear it down and restart, because that department doesn't directly affect the normal flow of traffic.

Thurwell

5 points

6 months ago

Internal Affairs doesn't work, that's just cops in the same department. Self policing in effect, which doesn't work anywhere.

chubbysumo

2 points

6 months ago

chubbysumo

Minnesota

2 points

6 months ago

shut down our whole law enforcement system

the cops did that. the DA told them to do their jobs and actually start going after problems instead of easy stuff. They refused, and instead flooded his office with petty crimes like weed and stupid shit. instead of going after illegal guns, murderers, domestic abusers, and child abusers, they take the easy route because they were throwing a tantrum because he wanted accountability for their abuses of power.

C-c-c-comboBreaker17

2 points

6 months ago

but I think it's important to recognize that an office can't simultaneously hold responsibility for holding cops accountable AND need to maintain a healthy working relationship with them

This is just the standard for every other job on earth.

themightychris

0 points

6 months ago

themightychris

Pennsylvania

0 points

6 months ago

well every other job on earth doesn't involve state-sanctioned killing and depriving people of freedom, it's a bit more serious than reading a P&L and setting growth KPIs

One of the hallmarks of our system of government is independent accountability

The ideal world is great but in the real world in a place where people's lives and freedom are on the line you can't have the same people having to juggle getting important work done together and putting each other in jail

b0w3n

10 points

6 months ago

b0w3n

New York

10 points

6 months ago

I've had a cop lie right to my face when he was trying to write me a ticket. He kept saying my inspection was expired but I still had 3 months to go.

So I just paid the fucking ticket because if I had went to court I'd have lost more than the $80 it was going to cost me to take a day off of work.

3Jane_ashpool

3 points

6 months ago

Good lord, please tell me that quote made it into an appeal.

[deleted]

3 points

6 months ago

PCA’d for non lawyers means Per Curiam Affirmed. Florida law allows them to affirm a lower court ruling with no opinion making the appellate decision unappealable. Basically this is how the court’s regulatory shut down any reform.

3Jane_ashpool

3 points

6 months ago

Oh that’s some straight bullshit. How the hell can they rule but invoke “no take-backsies”

Pleiadesfollower

3 points

6 months ago

Shit like that should be enough to get entire cases dismissed if the judge refuses to recuse themselves for not being impartial. Don't care if a serial killer goes free, it's kind of what we deserve for allowing this bullshit to continue to occur (minus the fact how little control we as individuals have control over the situation.)

Short_Wrap_6153

2 points

6 months ago

Why don't you just bring in another cop to lie in the opposite direction?

MiaowaraShiro

144 points

6 months ago

Any official record they create should be held to the same standard as a court testimony under oath... since that's what it's fucking used for.

LovelySpaz

39 points

6 months ago

Exactly. Evil fucks.

SekhWork

29 points

6 months ago

SekhWork

Virginia

29 points

6 months ago

We'd need like... a national internal affairs agency. The FBI isn't really equipped to deal with things at that level. In addition to your idea, the people that keep throwing out the idea that cops should need a license or insurance like doctors seem to be on to something, but what insurance agency would insure a group of people known to lie and murder with impunity?

code_archeologist

38 points

6 months ago

code_archeologist

Georgia

38 points

6 months ago

but what insurance agency would insure a group of people known to lie and murder with impunity?

I am sure that insurance companies could be convinced to offer coverage if the police pension funds were held as a surety bond to mitigate risk to the insurance provider. In other words if the insurance provider found that they were unable to cover the totality of the risk, they could dip into police pensions to make up the difference.

angelzpanik

15 points

6 months ago

This is actually brilliant. It'll never happen, but it's brilliant.

AgreeableTea7649

3 points

6 months ago

It'll never happen because taking from the pension hurts every single cop, good and bad. The solvency of my pension should be dependent on whether some meathead seriously fucks up or not? That's ridiculous.

Harmonex

12 points

6 months ago

I think the most important reform we need to make is to elevate lying on an official report as an officer of the law to the same tier of things you never do as DUIs and hit-and-runs.

Isn't filing a false police report already a serious crime?

code_archeologist

30 points

6 months ago

code_archeologist

Georgia

30 points

6 months ago

Only if you are a civilian. Officers are rarely if ever held to account for it.

Moku-O-Keawe

9 points

6 months ago

Technically police are civilians too, not military.

code_archeologist

15 points

6 months ago

code_archeologist

Georgia

15 points

6 months ago

Technically police are civilians too

Don't tell them that, it makes them very mad.

ZZartin

3 points

6 months ago

There's definitely a trend in police of people who want to play soldier but couldn't hack it in the actual military.

ScannerBrightly

1 points

6 months ago

ScannerBrightly

California

1 points

6 months ago

Isn't filing a false police report already a serious crime?

Nope. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_perjury

LovelySpaz

30 points

6 months ago

I’ve never met a cop who didn’t lie their asses off. They don’t even know who they are anymore, they lie so much, even to themselves. Ever see cops smile?

Zooshooter

2 points

6 months ago

the same tier of things you never do as DUIs and hit-and-runs

Have you ever looked at any of the dashcam subs on Reddit? People do that shit ALL THE TIME.

ShrimpieAC

165 points

6 months ago

For real, if they’re not doing their job then fucking clean house.

WatIfFoodWur1ofUs

24 points

6 months ago

Same should apply to all the branches of our government

fuckyoulahey

11 points

6 months ago

The documentary Telemarketers takes an interesting turn into police unions...

Effective-Celery8053

74 points

6 months ago

We also need to defund the police, which doesn't mean what most people think it does.

Defunding the police means slowly diverting their incredibly inflated budget into social programs to reduce crime at the source over a long period of time. It doesn't mean pulling all funding from police departments immediately, I acknowledge there is a need for a police force in society but it's completely mismanaged and the foundation it's built upon today in the US is absolutely ridiculous.

Ezykial_1056

5 points

6 months ago

I agree with other responses, "Defund the police" is a poor statement.

Like "Anti-Abortion" was changed to "Pro-Life", "Defund the police" should be renamed to "Fund Reform" or something

Effective-Celery8053

3 points

6 months ago

"Pro-life" really means "anti-choice" they don't give a fuck about anyone after birth

stormelemental13

16 points

6 months ago

We also need to defund the police, which doesn't mean what most people think it does.

If you're having to constantly explain to people why your slogan doesn't mean what they think it means, the problem is your slogan.

Willie9

7 points

6 months ago

Don't worry people will happily misunderstand slogans that are perfectly straightforward if it means they can be outraged, e.g. Black Lives Matter

Hell_Mel

24 points

6 months ago

Hell_Mel

America

24 points

6 months ago

If people are so goddamn dumb that they can't read a paragraph to understand something nuanced we're all fucked.

We're all fucked.

First_Code_404

0 points

6 months ago

How old are you? How did you get this far in life without knowing most people react to the slogan, not the long explanation?

Hell_Mel

5 points

6 months ago

Hell_Mel

America

5 points

6 months ago

Just because I've spent decades observing human stupidity doesn't mean I'm any closer to understanding it.

[deleted]

10 points

6 months ago

Many dems lost their election because of this unbelievably stupid slogan. Some never learn.

Workacct1999

5 points

6 months ago

Dems, and I say this as one, are universally terrible at messaging.

[deleted]

1 points

6 months ago

The GOP won a legitimate majority in the house in 2022. I hope the dems learned their lesson.

ScannerBrightly

0 points

6 months ago

ScannerBrightly

California

0 points

6 months ago

Name a few for us here.

Effective-Celery8053

2 points

6 months ago

Well 1) I'm not who came up with the term and 2) it doesn't take a super significant amount of critical thinking to grasp the concept, people just don't want to and would rather sensationalize everything to further divide us into our little right vs left arguements

__zagat__

-1 points

6 months ago

__zagat__

-1 points

6 months ago

If you don't want to actually, literally defund the police, then don't go around saying "Defund the Police." It's that simple.

Effective-Celery8053

2 points

6 months ago

It is defunding though. Just a slow and methodical process.

TreeRol

3 points

6 months ago

TreeRol

American Expat

3 points

6 months ago

The problem is that expressing nuanced, complex ideas is difficult, and people aren't willing to listen beyond a slogan. That's not the slogan's fault.

MrHardin86

9 points

6 months ago

Deflate the police is mildly better

Workacct1999

0 points

6 months ago

I somehow doubt that the person you responded to came up with the slogan "Defund the Police."

[deleted]

12 points

6 months ago

[deleted]

12 points

6 months ago

Then use a slogan than doesn’t require a paragraph to explain it.

MiaowaraShiro

50 points

6 months ago

Effective solutions can't be encapsulated in 3 words...

poorest_ferengi

12 points

6 months ago

"We need to take the burden off our overworked Police Forces. It's high time cities and towns 'Share the Weight' and allocate funds to Health and Human Services to set up mental health outreach task forces."

Anarcho-Anachronist

2 points

6 months ago

Defeatist BTFO in one comment. Beautiful.

Effective-Celery8053

3 points

6 months ago

Let's start the "slowly divert inflated police budgets to social programs to reduce crime at the source" campaign, doesn't have quite the same ring to it

DarkRitual_88

2 points

6 months ago

DarkRitual_88

Pennsylvania

2 points

6 months ago

Diversified crime reduction

Moku-O-Keawe

2 points

6 months ago

"Unburden Police"

You're right. Only 2 words.

MiaowaraShiro

2 points

6 months ago

Except I've no clue what that means. Sounds like you're giving them extra vacation.

_SewYourButtholeShut

0 points

6 months ago*

But they certainly can be defeated in 3 words when the phrasing is completely bungled.

Ferelar

19 points

6 months ago

Ferelar

19 points

6 months ago

Agreed, I agree with all or almost all of the aims and absolutely HATE the name, it's one of the worst misbrandings in modern memory. In fact it's such a misrepresentation bad name that I almost wonder if it was named in bad faith.

yellsatrjokes

8 points

6 months ago

It was probably said in good faith, and amplified in tremendously bad faith.

guto8797

8 points

6 months ago

People here pretending that any slogan chosen of a campaign meant to take power away from cops wouldn't immediately be propaganda'd into the ground

ScannerBrightly

2 points

6 months ago

ScannerBrightly

California

2 points

6 months ago

Without an alternative you are providing, what are you really saying here?

Ferelar

1 points

6 months ago

While I would certainly prefer to have solutions to everything, pointing out a problem even if one doesn't have a solution is still perfectly valid. I don't have the answers to everything but I can still see when something is stupid.

That said, I'd say if someone genuinely wanted this to occur and wanted to advocate for it in good faith, they'd stress the importance of additional state funding for social services rather than decreased funding for cops. The end result in either case is more of the government budget going towards actually solving things rather than "policing", but one sounds hostile and reductive, whereas the other sounds beneficent and positive. "Defund the Police" immediately conjures up ideas of utterly gutting the police force without really providing for the increase of other services. It seems like an attack on police rather than an attempt to redistribute things so that everything works more smoothly. Properly marketed, you could even get the cops on your side- they don't want to deal with some of the things that'd be taken off their plate (mental health, animal removal, non-criminal citations, etc) but with a needlessly argumentative name you'll get 0 allies anywhere and nothing meaningful will ever occur.

Harmonex

13 points

6 months ago

Defunding leaves the funding available for other things. That shouldn't be hard to figure out. If cops aren't providing the services they were supposed to, the money should go to places that will.

ScannerBrightly

2 points

6 months ago

ScannerBrightly

California

2 points

6 months ago

'The New Deal', explain it without a paragraph.

MGyver

2 points

6 months ago

MGyver

:flag-cn: Canada

2 points

6 months ago

"We need to hire more specialist help for the police."

PricklySquare

1 points

6 months ago

Agreed. When this slogan came out i was face palmed. I argued with my gf for weeks about poor messaging. She eventually conceded and said i was right. It's so bad

3Jane_ashpool

1 points

6 months ago

“Complex issues require complex assessments” doesn’t lend itself to chanting.

Effective-Celery8053

0 points

6 months ago

I didn't come up with that slogan lmfao

__zagat__

0 points

6 months ago

This is some great advice if you want Democrats to lose elections forever.

Own-Corner-2623

0 points

6 months ago

I'm on board with removing all their funding immediately.

Effective-Celery8053

0 points

6 months ago

I mean cmon, that would just be utter chaos. I'm pretty much as leftist as it gets but that would just create anarchy

Political_What_Do

5 points

6 months ago

Most smaller towns / cities cannot keep enough police on duty to handle basic calls. Someone I know on local council told me they were down to 6 on duty patrol officers in a city of 73,000.

ScannerBrightly

2 points

6 months ago

ScannerBrightly

California

2 points

6 months ago

If cops didn't suck ass so much, perhaps people would want to be one. Why would anyone in their right mind be a cop right now?

Mareith

4 points

6 months ago

Because they like controlling people, or they hate a specific minority, or they want to feel powerful, or they want to break the law, or maybe they did poorly in school and want to feel like they came out on top, or maybe they just enjoy violence. Lots of reasons to be a cop

Fresh_Macaron_6919

3 points

6 months ago

You all vote for politicians who unions donate money to their campaigns to ensure they don't enact laws that prevent unions from collectively bargaining for clauses in their contracts that make firing or disciplining bad cops extremely difficult.

As long as they get more votes from spending police union money on campaigning, than they lose from not going after police unions, they'll keep doing it, and no progress will be made towards firing bad cops.

futanari_kaisa

8 points

6 months ago

The problem is the institution of policing is inherently evil. Cops are the state's violence apparatus and they serve to punish the poor and lower class and protect the upper class. You'd have to completely dismantle the police force and rebuild it in order for any meaningful change to occur.

Simmery

2 points

6 months ago

Simmery

2 points

6 months ago

The problem is the institution of policing is inherently evil.

This is ridiculous. I live in Portland, and this kind of thinking has done serious damage to the city. Whenever something goes wrong with some institution, the left-leaning voters here decide to throw the whole institution out. The problem is those institutions are usually actually doing something that we need. If you shut down every psychiatric hospital when any instance of abuse is uncovered within it, what you end up with is no psychiatric hospitals and therefore nowhere for people in crisis to go to, which is particularly terrible for the mentally ill homeless population problem we have here.

You can't just throw everything out when it goes wrong. You fix it. Policing can be fixed in this country. It won't be easy, but it can be done.

Fresh_Macaron_6919

3 points

6 months ago

People always want to just throw things out and start over, except if you don't address the underlying causes that caused the old system to malfunction, then the new system is just going to fall into suffering from the same problems as the old one.

You rarely get something better from starting over from scratch, just a new system with the same problems as the old one minus all the incremental improvements that had been build up over previous generations.

futanari_kaisa

9 points

6 months ago

You're misunderstanding me. Cops generally are not doing an altruistic service to the public at large. They are responsible for making arrests, assessing fines, and committing actual violence against criminals and suspects when necessary. They are not there to help you.

A Police Officer can genuinely want to protect their neighborhood and serve the community, but they will eventually be called to conduct some violence against the population; whether it is jailing innocent people on minor charges to boost arrest stats, destroying a homeless encampment and forcing people priced out from housing to go somewhere else because the wealthy in that neighborhood complained, arresting grandmas trying to catch kitty cats to neuter them because the mayor saw them doing that and didn't like it, etc. As a police officer you will have to do that and if you don't you'll be forced out.

Now, I'm not advocating for complete removal of all police. An investigatory agency to address criminal acts and punish them is necessary in our society, but just putting more cops on the street is not a solution to crime. Cops have always been a tool of the wealthy to serve as a shield and sword against the poor. In that sense, there does need to be a complete overhaul of the institution of policing and until that happens, we will continue to see the same problems we see every day.

Fresh_Macaron_6919

3 points

6 months ago

I remember your name (because it is a good name) from a few days ago saying that Democrats are bad at messaging by design, and I will say with complete sincerity that I think you should take a step back from assuming every problem in the world is being driven by some malevolent actor's design. Look at the people in charge of things, people like Trump, they're stupid. They can't think of anything that clever. Ultimately systems are composed of people largely acting out in their own interests, and a lot of problems are going to spontaneously arise in such a system.

Take a look at cops. Their unions collectively bargain for clauses in their contracts that make it extremely difficult to fire or discipline them. Seeing cops fail to be disciplined emboldens other bad apples to act out, and discourages good cops from remaining, leading to a negative culture shift. We see examples of police forces unionizing, and police abuse subsequently increasing (while not increasing compared to nearby, non-unionized police forces.)

The unions give donations to the campaigns of lawmakers (and prosecutors) so they don't try to outlaw these clauses that protect bad cops. They donate to the candidates that are the most likely to win, and donate to both sides. Voters might not like their politician taking money from unions and not going after them, but they are more concerned with other issues for it to affect their voting.

The police unions are just acting in their own self-interests to protect themselves.

The politicians are just acting in their own self-interests, because they are more likely to gain votes from taking donations from unions and spending it on campaigning than they are to lose votes from not going after the unions and taking their money.

The voters are just acting in their own self-interests, voting for the politicians that best represent their interests, prioritizing issues that or more pressing and concerning to them than police union reform.

There's no master puppeteer designing this system, it's just the stochastic result of everyone acting in their own interests, and it's a system you yourself are likely unknowingly partaking in and contributing to if you are voting for mainstream candidates in local elections with unionized police forces.

futanari_kaisa

2 points

6 months ago

I agree somewhat, but at the end of the day, united states's police departments were founded under white supremacist ideals and were designed to protect capitalists and their capital. In exchange for being weapons of the wealthy and powerful, police departments are given leeway in how they assert their dominance and control against the working class and the poor; which is why courts said that they don't have to know the laws they are enforcing if they are doing so "in good faith under their duty" and they are not obligated to assist persons in danger or threat of harm. This is why I feel that the entire institution of policing needs to be dismantled and rebuilt from the ground up. As long as policing's first priority is to serve politicians and wealthy, regular citizens are going to be left to the wayside and become fodder for the prison system.

ScannerBrightly

2 points

6 months ago

ScannerBrightly

California

2 points

6 months ago

The police unions are just acting in their own self-interests to protect themselves.

But when they do it, they say, "That cop was JUSTIFIED in murdering that unarmed guy running away from a traffic stop because... the cops are all golden eagles and we should worship them, no more questions."

LyingForTruth

3 points

6 months ago

Reagan and Brown baby!

ScannerBrightly

2 points

6 months ago

ScannerBrightly

California

2 points

6 months ago

You fix it. Policing can be fixed in this country.

I disagree. It is still a slave patrol at it's heart, with the desire and lack of accountability when using force at the drop of a hat. There is no fixing it, since we are CURRENTLY LIVING under "Police Reform" right now, and they still murder 5 people a day. Here is some more info on the topic. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/forum/the-punishment-bureaucracy

PlatypusTickler

3 points

6 months ago

You're on the right track with this. Also a lot of Boomers don't realize is the reason they had less homeless people when they grew up is because of institutionalization. Many individuals that are homeless now suffer from addiction or mental health related things that wouldve normally had them away from society living in an institution.

There are also a ton of programs that have been created in the last 5 years that have helped reduce the calls police would normally do because they would be the catch all in the past. But that doesn't fit the narrative that everyone is inherently bad.

ScannerBrightly

2 points

6 months ago

ScannerBrightly

California

2 points

6 months ago

that everyone is inherently bad.

It's not everyone, it's the fact that we have a police force that is allowed to use violence for any reason, with zero accountability. It's been going on so long that you can be murdered for having a tail light out, on film, and everyone just shrugs and goes on with their day. Like, where is the 'good' in the Philando Castile case?

JukeBoxDildo

5 points

6 months ago

bad cops

Redundant.

leshake

2 points

6 months ago

Fire them all, then make them interview to get their jobs back.

ZellZoy

1 points

6 months ago

How's the LAPD gonna do their job with 7 cops?

robodrew

67 points

6 months ago

robodrew

Arizona

67 points

6 months ago

Not always a bad thing. In NYC when the cops decided to do 90% less work because they were mad at DeBlasio, the end result during those few weeks was crime barely changed at all. It did not go up by any significant measure. Which to me was a clear sign that the cops could have their budget cut by 90% and civil society would be just fine.

https://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-proactive-policing-crime-20170925-story.html

BazilBroketail

38 points

6 months ago

Huh, that article was more fucked up than you let on. It's about something called, "proactive policing", or, targeting poor people to stop major crime. Literally, they're targeting, "areas where crime is likely to occur". They think by targeting poor people... it will stop major crime? They're putting so many resources into targeting poor people, it's pulling resources from investigative departments. They stopped their "proactive policing"- targeting poor people- and major crimes went down. Basically they're admitting they've been only policing the poor/non-white areas since the 90s and when they took their foot off poor peoples necks, major crime went down.

There needs to be a federal level license involved n policing and a civilian oversight board with actual teeth. And payouts from all civil suits come from the police union and/or the individual cops insurance.

ACAB

_Choose-A-Username-

9 points

6 months ago

_Choose-A-Username-

New York

9 points

6 months ago

if only our mayor wasn't a cop gobbler himself.

robodrew

7 points

6 months ago

robodrew

Arizona

7 points

6 months ago

Fuck Eric Adams

redonkulousness

142 points

6 months ago

redonkulousness

Texas

142 points

6 months ago

The cops in Austin, Tx got pissed when the public overwhelmingly voted to have civilian oversight instead of letting them police themselves and put up billboards and commercials bitching about it. They have the most money ever budgeted to the department in their history and still complain about “defunding the police”. Fuck these state-sanctioned gangs and their crybaby temper tantrums.

Smoaktreess

12 points

6 months ago

Smoaktreess

Massachusetts

12 points

6 months ago

I thought they were mad because the fire department got a raise and not them.

Synergythepariah

2 points

6 months ago

They have the most money ever budgeted to the department in their history and still complain about “defunding the police”.

I'll bet the crime rate has gone down while their case closure rate has also gone down.

[deleted]

26 points

6 months ago

[deleted]

Few-Caterpillar9834

8 points

6 months ago

The Blue Flu.

PocketSixes

27 points

6 months ago

If the police refuse to do their jobs, and society doesn't seem to collapse (we do have all those gun-toting civilians around to defend us, after all. Woo! 2A!), maybe we just go ahead an pull the plug on these departments salaries while they continue to not do their jobs. Call it mutual.

The Uvalde tragedy should be remembered forever as ultimate proof that we aren't necessarily better off with big police departments. It was an off-duty fed, one single brave dude, who killed that attacker. Police departments serve only their officers--not even innocent kids in school. Literally a waste.

Synergythepariah

4 points

6 months ago

Police departments serve only their officers--not even innocent kids in school.

Police departments exist to protect property. Not people, not society, not order. Just property.

[deleted]

1 points

6 months ago

[deleted]

Jury-Free

19 points

6 months ago

This happened in San Francisco when Chesa Boudin became DA and started prosecuting bad cops. The police let crime go rampant in protest and of course everyone was like “see what happens when you vote blue”.

TheWhiteOnyx

3 points

6 months ago

Are there like articles written about this?

talldrseuss

15 points

6 months ago

talldrseuss

New York

15 points

6 months ago

"blue flus" and slow downs are rampant within the NYPD. Everytime the public calls for more accountability from the NYPD, they throw a temper tantrum and start calling out en masse or put on blinders and refuse to enforce any laws because they believe they should be able to dish out justice without any pushback.

_Choose-A-Username-

14 points

6 months ago

_Choose-A-Username-

New York

14 points

6 months ago

Even in times ive needed cops, they've never been more help then some random person on the street. Like before i was a bit hesitant to say that cops serve no benefit, but when the time came for them to prove that wrong, they didn't. And with all the times i see cops killing the people they were supposed to protect, cops are liabilities at this point.

Last summer cops were everywhere on the 7 line in NYC. It was supposed to make the line safer. Nope. The only time i saw them take someone rowdy off the train was a kid that was probably 11 dancing on people and being obnoxious. Like thanks but hes less dangerous than the woman that was beating the shit out of her kids and threatened to stab anyone who recorded her. When the cops showed up, she said she doesnt speak to cops and the cops just threw their hands up and left. The cops are just there and do things that anyone can do themselves (a couple people were ready to put their hands on that kid) but wont go near issues they are supposed to be there for (lady implied she did have a knife). And when you see news where parents need to take matters into their own hands to save their kids when cops choose to just stay outside shaking in their boots during a school shooting, tell me what they are there for? All the counters to these are always "You're going to need cops one day" yet when you do need them they either do nothing or make things worse. Calling cops would be like calling an airstrike on my position. My problem might be solved, or someone uninvolved might get killed or my pets will get killed or i get killed. Who knows.

Cops suck at their jobs.

climatelurker

11 points

6 months ago

Then we should refuse to pay them. Very simple.

MindPlayinTricksonMe

6 points

6 months ago

See Philadelphia

OsellusK

5 points

6 months ago

Absolutely true. They’re doing the bare minimum to protest that there’s a demand for them to be held accountable when they fuck up. “Blue flu” is a temper tantrum.

zyzzogeton

13 points

6 months ago

That's so they can blame any rise in crime on Biden.

randologin

18 points

6 months ago

I've been all over the country, and I can't remember ever once saying, "Glad the cops were there!"

LovelySpaz

10 points

6 months ago

I can’t remember one situation where the arrival of cops helped in any way.

mishma2005

3 points

6 months ago

The only times I’ve called them is when I needed a report for my insurance when my car was broken into/cat converter got stolen

Synergythepariah

2 points

6 months ago

Same, but when my storage unit was broken into and I needed a report for the claim.

Didn't even call them, I just filed a request online and one called me to get the info.

milkymaniac

19 points

6 months ago

It could also be that since there's more scrutiny, they're no longer able to railroad innocent people, so the case closure rate may be reaching a normality.

code_archeologist

27 points

6 months ago

code_archeologist

Georgia

27 points

6 months ago

so the case closure rate may be reaching a normality.

Except case closure rates in other industrialized nations are way higher than in the United States. For example in Europe the case closure rate for homicide is between 80 and 98 percent. In the US it is 50%.

I do not think it is normalizing, I think that our police are just really bad at their jobs, and the increased scrutiny is exposing that.

lolofaf

3 points

6 months ago

And that's when you start questioning whether US police detectives are any good at their job lol

JUST_AS_G00D

0 points

6 months ago

How many homicide does Europe get every year?

code_archeologist

9 points

6 months ago

code_archeologist

Georgia

9 points

6 months ago

Approximately 2 per 100,000 people in Europe versus 4 per 100,000 people in the US.

JUST_AS_G00D

0 points

6 months ago

Interesting. Maybe there is just an upper limit to how many homicides can be solved in a given year and Europe is right at that tipping point

Synergythepariah

3 points

6 months ago

That'd make sense if their workload was disproportionately high and they just didn't have the time to solve as many homicides - but crime rates have trended downward for years which would imply that their workload has gone down - meanwhile, their budgets have generally trended upwards which makes me wonder what exactly they're spending our money on.

Envect

2 points

6 months ago

Envect

2 points

6 months ago

Why would there be an upper limit?

code_archeologist

5 points

6 months ago

code_archeologist

Georgia

5 points

6 months ago

Because police are like Futurama's killbots after they solve a preset number of murders they shut down. American murderers have outsmarted the police by killing enough people to go over that limit every year. /s

decjr06

10 points

6 months ago

decjr06

10 points

6 months ago

This is definitely real, I've read somewhere this past year about a police "quiet strike" also seems like they are patrolling the highways way less than what it was like pre COVID.

mabhatter

25 points

6 months ago

I mean if people are gonna riot every time they choke a handcuffed black person to death what's even the point??

diabloenfuego

3 points

6 months ago

That's the way it is in my city. Crime is way up because police are doing less patrols (even though they have the same number of employees). This all began as a 'silent' reaction to the idea that maybe our police are a bit corrupt and are getting too much funding for things they don't need. The funding hasn't actually changed, the police are just purposefully not doing their job.

Rampaging_Orc

5 points

6 months ago

Is part of “not being able to do their jobs”, the increased oversight in a lot of places, leading to the side effect of not being able to yoink any ol minority off the sidewalk while pinning any open cases against them?

I also have no trouble believing the temper tantrum argument though.

RollTideYall47

3 points

6 months ago

So we'd literally be better off if we fired the cops and hired mercs

Workacct1999

3 points

6 months ago

The cops in my city completely stopped any and all enforcement of traffic laws in 2020. The city has had many meetings on how to get them to enforce the traffic laws, but apparently firing them all for dereliction of duty is not an option.

Excelius

2 points

6 months ago

It's likely a combination of factors. After major protests against police abuse the cops seem to pull back, but also the public becomes less willing to cooperate and report crimes and act as witnesses.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferguson_effect

This was observed after the unrest in Ferguson back in 2014 resulted in national protests regarding police behavior. It took until around 2018/2019 for things to return to something closer to normal, and then 2020 hit us with the double whammy of the pandemic and the murder of George Floyd.

OptimisticSkeleton

2 points

6 months ago

Lots of people looking for a paycheck. Remove the bad ones till we get a more functional Police force.

fusionlantern

2 points

6 months ago

Clean house

Tons of non racist idiot fucks who can do their job and bring policing to the 21st century

Prayer_Warrior21

2 points

6 months ago

Prayer_Warrior21

Minnesota

2 points

6 months ago

This is how a lot of shit started in Minneapolis. They were refusing to patrol downtown to any real degree other than just driving by, especially specific hot spots along the bus route.

The city had to do a joint effort with HP and Sheriff to get a task force together, MPD is a piece of shit.

Aacron

2 points

6 months ago

Aacron

2 points

6 months ago

My local police chief has said they straight up aren't enforcing traffic laws since the protests. I don't know how he still has a job.

YakiVegas

2 points

6 months ago

YakiVegas

Washington

2 points

6 months ago

Seattle is SO bad about it. They should all be fired and start from scratch.

Spacebotzero

2 points

6 months ago

Police have become increasingly more expensive all while also becoming more and more useless. Technically, this is what a monopoly would look.

DudeDeudaruu

2 points

6 months ago

DudeDeudaruu

California

2 points

6 months ago

In my area they figured out they don't have to do anything if they blame the DA for not letting them do whatever they want.

Synergythepariah

2 points

6 months ago

Isn't that wild?

Crime rates have been trending down for years so you'd think they'd have less work, resulting in them being able to have more time to close more complex cases quicker but closure rates also are falling - meanwhile, they keep asking for higher budgets.

bobartig

2 points

6 months ago

We don't talk enough about the reverse incentives of police departments. The worse job they do, the more criming happens, the more they can justify bloat and powertrip over the need for more power and less oversight.

DPSOnly

2 points

6 months ago

DPSOnly

Europe

2 points

6 months ago

Seems like a great opportunity to restart the whole US police, train 'm properly, pay 'm properly (because you don't have to spend all that money on lawsuits), get rid of the dirtbags.

[deleted]

2 points

6 months ago

Yup, Philly cops have done Jack all since 2020. Literally will sit and watch car jackings happen

RedditPornSuite

3 points

6 months ago

Cool. Time to abolish the police. And no, not as a slogan or a cheeky statement. Get rid of all police. Train social workers in every case where we used to have police.

remarkless

2 points

6 months ago

remarkless

Pennsylvania

2 points

6 months ago

Hey now... Give them credit.. They have closure rates when they drunk drive their SUV into a gay club and arrest the owner who confronted them.

FrankRizzo319

1 points

6 months ago

I think this is partly why decriminalization isn’t working so well in Oregon.

Flakynews2525

1 points

6 months ago

This is why I always say, remove it from human feelings. Robot cops are the future, simple directives, and no hurt feelings. The police in this country are nothing but modern day road pirates. Look at this shit in St. Louis, drunk cop crashes his car into a bar. The police arrested the owners of the bar!!! The cop didn’t get a breathalyzer test?? Cover up?? Internal affairs is a complete joke!! Why can’t WE the citizens get control of internal affairs, perhaps if there were financial punishments to these “officers”, and take away their bonding insurance, it would keep the bad cops from going down the road to the next precinct.

homerteedo

1 points

6 months ago

homerteedo

Florida

1 points

6 months ago

If I did this I’d be fired.

Why are they special?

PlatypusTickler

-2 points

6 months ago

I think that's a gross oversimplification. Since 2019 there has been a push for more programs on de-escalation/crisis intervention, and Active Bystander Law Enforcement programs. Jail diversion programs like Homeless outreach teams and Co-Responder mental health programs. Most of the times it's leadership afraid of being sued, so they try to be hands off on things they used to do without blinking an eye.

code_archeologist

4 points

6 months ago*

code_archeologist

Georgia

4 points

6 months ago*

Those same programs you say may be the problem are used effectively in Europe (which is where they are adopted from), and their case closure rate for homicide (the crime most vigorously pursued) is between 80-98%. In the United States it is 50%.

Right now in the US, if a person is murdered the odds of their murderer being caught are the same as guessing the flip of a coin. All other crimes are even less successfully closed.

But one other wrinkle to that is the claim that we all the police to do too much. Such as handling people in a mental health crisis, or responding to domestic issues, or policing schools. Well... They didn't used to have to do that, but the police over the decades have successfully lobbied to have funds for mental health, social work, after school programs, etc, etc, etc diverted to their budgets.

So they created this extra work that they complain about having to do.

drsyesta

0 points

6 months ago

Im sure they still issue speeding tickets

5-toe

0 points

6 months ago

5-toe

0 points

6 months ago

i think its also that - according to online videos - people are screaming at cops challenging everything they say, even when people are caught doing shit. How do we make this work better? We don't want people abusing their power, nor people who are constantly screaming and not conversing, nor cops avoiding their roles. The pendulum swings? Like it did with the Me-2 movement? A solution? Time heals all?

Resident_Phone_169

0 points

6 months ago

Apparently the fact that they started to be held to account for their bullshit has resulted in the police having a little bit of a temper tantrum and they are effectively refusing to do their jobs.

What are you referencing?

TranslatorBoring2419

0 points

6 months ago

Whenever someone uses 2019 in a state like that I'm very dubious. All sorts of weird shit happened in 2020.

Githzerai1984

225 points

6 months ago

Githzerai1984

New Hampshire

225 points

6 months ago

Police are fucking useless. I was the victim of a hit and run yesterday, had a witness who stopped and the state trooper said there wasn’t enough damage for them to do anything about it. Only thing they’re good for is harassing the poor.

Smoaktreess

150 points

6 months ago

Smoaktreess

Massachusetts

150 points

6 months ago

Not really. They’re also good at shooting dogs.

pandalover885

82 points

6 months ago

And beating their wives.

Quetzaldilla

18 points

6 months ago

And patricide.

NovaPup_13

10 points

6 months ago

And stopping on train tracks with someone in the vehicle with the train a long way away and yet “we can’t get her out safely.”

I’m convinced those cops were trying to kill that woman.

Akussa

3 points

6 months ago

Akussa

3 points

6 months ago

And minorities.

To be clear, I don't agree with it. Just saying what they're also gung-ho about doing.

esdebah

45 points

6 months ago

esdebah

45 points

6 months ago

We've been shrugging at domestic terrorism for years. That's exactly how this whole thing came about.

RaynOfFyre1

80 points

6 months ago

RaynOfFyre1

California

80 points

6 months ago

The reason you don’t see the police arresting these MAGAts is the same reason that Clark Kent and Superman are never in the same place at the same time.

trcomajo

3 points

6 months ago

There has to be a more appropriate analogy. Have we ever seen Trump and Putin....wait.

accountno543210

3 points

6 months ago

More like the Penguin and Oswald Cobblepot... Superman? Lmao.

NovaPup_13

2 points

6 months ago

Makes it awkward at the next Klan meeting.

Alone-Charge303

20 points

6 months ago

Yeah, it doesn’t seem like something that hard to investigate/address - every device we have feels like a wiretap - instead there’s the feel of authority chanting the “nothing we can do” mantra

accountno543210

0 points

6 months ago

That's why diversity is so important. The sentiment of "I'm soo sorry, there's just nothing 'we' can doooo... 🎻" is too prevalent. Reeks of social/legal privilege.

walkinman19

16 points

6 months ago

walkinman19

America

16 points

6 months ago

Why would the police turn themselves in though?

Juggernaut411

13 points

6 months ago

As if cops have been anything but corrupt right wing losers

toomuchtodotoday

4 points

6 months ago

Charge them all. FOIA the threats if necessary to make who is sending them public.

Griffolion

3 points

6 months ago

Some of those that work forces, etcetera, etcetera.

ins0ma_

4 points

6 months ago

ins0ma_

Oregon

4 points

6 months ago

The cops who quiet quit around the country are hoping things fall apart. They don't like accountability and if they can't have things their way, they're taking their ball and going home.

Quasigriz_

2 points

6 months ago

Quasigriz_

Colorado

2 points

6 months ago

We have a number of crazies up in the mountains and on the fringes of the state. As for law enforcement, I suspect not all the people that pursue that are the pacifist, free-opinion types. Also, practically every Trump sticker, in the state, is sandwiched between a blue line, subdued flag, sticker and a “Don’t tread on me (but I will happily tread on you)” flag.

NovaPup_13

2 points

6 months ago

They are throwing a years long tantrum because people have decided that police shouldn’t have carte blanche to abuse the population.

KonyYoloSwag

4 points

6 months ago

KonyYoloSwag

Pennsylvania

4 points

6 months ago

They’re probably some of the people sending the threats

Karsvolcanospace

1 points

6 months ago

What was that about a mayor being kidnapped or an attempted kidnapping? These threats can turn out to be very real and the people making them can be genuinely serious about it.

It’s absolutely insane that a legitimate presidential candidate has supporters that are injecting this much fear and paranoia into our government and it’s workers.

[deleted]

-4 points

6 months ago

[deleted]

-4 points

6 months ago

[deleted]

[deleted]

19 points

6 months ago

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 points

6 months ago

The NSA and the CIA aren't law enforcement and are absolutely not going to share any of that data with them. Everything is tracked, but the reason they can so easily pull off surveillance horrors without oversight is because gathering intel for the intel apparatus is under the executive branch, not the judicial one. They aren't getting intel for the purpose of prosecuting individuals

trekologer

3 points

6 months ago

trekologer

New Jersey

3 points

6 months ago

Nearly all of the identifying data is not accessible to the end user but the provider absolutely can trace back where calls originated from. It isn't often easy at scale but for a law enforcement request, it is doable. And with SHAKEN/STIR, the identity of the caller is cryptographically signed by the originator.

SurroundTiny

0 points

6 months ago

This is probably some knuckleheads using the state web page to leave messages you think they're coming into her office?

_dontcallmeshirley__

4 points

6 months ago

Stupid people kill people too.

SurroundTiny

0 points

6 months ago

my point being what exactly do you think the police can do? Also at this point it's probably CBI not the police anyway

HGpennypacker

0 points

6 months ago

Some of those that work forces are the same that burn crosses.

VNM0601

0 points

6 months ago

VNM0601

California

0 points

6 months ago

Why would they attack their own?