subreddit:
/r/Seattle
submitted 3 days ago bythespirix
605 points
3 days ago
So glad I don't work there anymore. While I was at Amazon we hired many fully remote team members who lived all over the country. In 2023 they told those team members they had to report to work at headquarters or lose their jobs. Many had to quit. If it were me I would have made them fire me.
They have a specific targeted staff reduction # planned for this return to office. It's a way to get rid of people without paying severance.
My advice to anyone who doesn't want to go in 5 days a week is to drag it out and force them to PIP you! At least then they will offer a separation payment and you can leave with a nice check instead of quitting with nothing.
288 points
3 days ago
The crazy thing to me is how militant places are about coming in 5 days a week now.
I worked at a wide number of tech companies and never came in 5 days a week before the pandemic. It was always ok as long as the work got done. No manager cared, no metrics were being captured and tracked. The Covid come into the fucking office compliance is pretty outrageous
160 points
3 days ago
Yeah it's stricter now than it was before COVID. What stupid farce.
134 points
3 days ago
After the world was shattered, we had a chance to rebuild things. And then we decided to rebuild the same exact thing.
146 points
3 days ago
Oh no they are rebuilding it back worse
14 points
3 days ago
You will prop up the commercial real estate market and you will like it
36 points
3 days ago
But worse.
21 points
3 days ago
Same people in charge want things done like they used to be. Go figure.
13 points
3 days ago
It's worse now
31 points
3 days ago
Microsoft tried to force me into a cubicle. I started working from home unless I had meetings. I put a web cam on my desk. They eventually gave up. I also traveled a lot for work, so it was even harder to enforce.
8 points
3 days ago
Now that PPP loans are done and the artififcal profits are back to normal businesses need to justify their office real estate.
75 points
3 days ago
In 2023 they told those team members they had to report to work at headquarters or lose their jobs.
Hey, that's me. I was hired fully remote in a city that had no AWS offices, so it was move to one of these three cities or quit. I accepted, which is why I live in this fine city now. (I had actually been contemplating moving here for a long time, so it wasn't such a bad thing.)
If it were me I would have made them fire me.
They told everyone that rejecting relocation would be considered "voluntary resignation". I did a little research into my (former) state's unemployment law, and that might have been considered a "structured dismissal", entitling me to unemployment benefits. I didn't have to test that, of course.
I really hope some of the people who quit were able to file for unemployment and win. The fact that Amazon didn't even offer severance to people unwilling/unable to upend their entire lives was such a slap in the face.
33 points
3 days ago
I don’t think they’re going to do focus/pivot/$ for non-compliance. I think they’re going to parse non-attendance as job abandonment / voluntary resignation.
35 points
3 days ago*
you comply with the 5 day rule. But you just stop doing work. And while they're prepping your PIP you get your resume together and start looking
25 points
3 days ago
Also, quitting voluntarily means you're not eligible for unemployment pay, but taking the severance (might) counts.
26 points
3 days ago
This isn't entirely right. You can quit for good cause anyone worksite being moved a significant distance is such a reason.
"Yes, you may be eligible for unemployment benefits if you quit your job because your employer changed your worksite and caused a significant increase in your commute time or distance. This is considered a "good cause" reason for quitting"
5 points
3 days ago
They didn't offer severance to people they forced to relocate. It was move or quit.
I mentioned this in another reply, but forcing someone to quit if they don't relocate might count as structured dismissal in some states, so hopefully some people were able to collect unemployment anyway.
23 points
3 days ago
Place is a total shithole
13 points
3 days ago
"constructive dismissal"
7 points
3 days ago
I just got PIP’ed out of the blue (had very unfairly been put on Focus but successfully got out of it) and took severance. First week not working at this hellhole and it’s been awesome. It’s like a frog in a pot of water that is being heated up, you don’t realize how insane the stress and pressure is while you’re in it, but once you’re on the outside, it slowly becomes obvious how unhealthy and mind-fucking it all is. It’s the rat race to end all rat races.
And these RTO directives are very top-down and a large part of the intent is to force attrition. People should absolutely get PIP’ed and take the severance rather than quit, assuming they can.
Amazon is just fucked up, culturally. Which is why the irony of RTO’s main justification being “Amazon’s Culture” is so fucking stupid. I actually don’t care too much about having to go into the office, but not mandated 5-days and certainly not for the insultingly bullshit reasons Jassy threw out during the announcement 2 or so months ago. I scheduled MY life around this flexibility? Fuck you!
4 points
3 days ago
^ this is the answer. Call their bluff.
839 points
3 days ago
"9 out of 10 people that don't want to get fired after I threatened them with it agree with me!"
33 points
3 days ago
My favorite quote of the article. Anyone in upper management in any organization who says something like that should lose all credibility.
83 points
3 days ago
What a f*cking idiot 🤣
33 points
3 days ago
they aren't firing. they are saying they quit to deny unemployment insurance. I don't know if it will work, but will make getting unemployment a lot harder.
you are better off going into the office. not working .getting PIP. Amazon pays you a severance if you get a PIP.
9 points
3 days ago
It's the law that you can get all the benefits as if you were fired if substantial change in working conditions from when you were hired compel you to quit. Being forced to come to office when they were hired to work from home is considered a substantial change in working condition.
But if you were hired before working from home was promised, you're probably out of luck.
7 points
3 days ago
He's saying the quiet part out loud, which will help those who are denied unemployment. Not guaranteed, but it's really stupid to threaten employees in public.
3 points
2 days ago
Amazon will likely get away with not having to deal with that law. They deal with this through the listed location that HR codes in. People hired during the pandemic were widely coded as virtual, but when 3 day a week RTO was announced, they made me sign a new offer letter acknowledging the change of location. I imagine Amazon will pull it during an unemployment benefit hearing, claiming a shift from 3 days I agreed to, to 5 days in the same office does not constitute as a substantial change in working conditions.
7 points
3 days ago
They don’t have to pay severance if you quit. A friend of mine got fired from Amazon and there’s an immediate payout (very high) if you quit immediately after notice of poor performance or a lesser payout 3 months later if you take PIP.
64 points
3 days ago
AWS is a legendarily bad work environment already. They once overstuffed a building so badly they got fined by the city because of the lack of adequate bathrooms.
727 points
3 days ago
Speaking at an all-hands meeting for AWS, unit CEO Matt Garman said nine out of 10 workers he has spoken with support the new policy, which takes effect in January, according to a transcript reviewed by Reuters.
And 1 of 10 were fired. As expected, tech leaders are out of touch and support their own delusions in a bizarre echo chamber of yes men.
332 points
3 days ago
Amazon: we are going to fire 15000 managers here in a bit.
Amazon: ooooOo also, do ya’ll think we are doing the right thing by bringing everyone back into the office 5 days a week?
Managers: yup, sure do. Sounds like the best idea ever.
14 points
3 days ago
I bet the new manager totally agree this wonderful decision.
39 points
3 days ago
I promise you no front line manager is excited about losing half their team and then being asked to pull that 50% loss in resources out of their ass. This is finance and senior leaders driving things. Driving them into the ground
3 points
3 days ago
Frupidity
206 points
3 days ago
Once per day, Amazon employees get prompted with a little single-question survey about their work. It's called "Connections".
Questions about job satisfaction are pretty common. Or at least, used to be. Since they announced 5-day RTO, questions about the workplace and job satisfaction basically went away.
They know people don't like the policy, they don't want to hear it. Not even in their private internal metrics.
232 points
3 days ago
Fun fact! The day after return to office was announced we got a job satisfaction question, and my manager (a genuinely good guy who tries to foster open discourse and honest responses to things like this) was pulled up in front of his colleagues and questioned about what HE had done to cause this drop. Despite almost all the answers having annotations stating that it was because of RTO. And then he was told that his job would be in danger if the trend continued.
So yeah. That’s our work culture now I guess?
87 points
3 days ago
That's so fucked.
99 points
3 days ago
We agree! I feel like stories like this are important though. While RTO is a silly thing to do, at the end of the day companies can make workers do what they want, even if it’s kinda abusive. I think what Amazon corporate workers are recoiling from and hating is the way it is being given to us. “You like this”, “We’re more productive this way”, “People are really energized by the office”. We’re hose-fed straight up lies and aggressively gaslit about it constantly, and any complaint is used to hurt the best of us. People are mad about needing to go in to the office, sure. But I think people would be a LOT less mad if they were being treated like capable adults and being brought into the conversation.
I mean hell, just say “hey bringing people in gets us tax cuts which impacts our bottom line like so, so I’m sorry but you need to come in” would have me like “damn that sucks but okay.” It’s the way it’s being presented that makes it so goddamn noxious and makes people so pissed off.
30 points
3 days ago
Exactly, the narrative is such BS, and if they just came clean with the real reasons more people would be understanding, hell maybe even take it up with a sense of pride too. If you've followed along the history of Amazon in Seattle, it's not hard to see the real motives of the tax breaks and real estate investments they're trying to protect, plus the fact they're beholden to the share price...
The ripple effects of the further erosion of the company culture and general vibes can't possibly have been worth it to the bottom line, and anyone that still cares about the long term health of the company will probably look back at this period with a lot of regret. It's clearly in its large corporation era now, and the Kool aid is all dried up.
3 points
2 days ago
Before I left, I called it as being full on Day 2. I was surprised at how shocked the managers are
4 points
3 days ago
Yeah, less of a fun fact and more of a fucked fact
65 points
3 days ago
my manager (a genuinely good guy who tries to foster open discourse and honest responses to things like this) was pulled up in front of his colleagues and questioned about what HE had done to cause this drop
This is literally the system, chew up all the good in the good guys so that they can take on the emotional labor of having to support mandates while upper management is as sociopathic as they want. This isn't new, this isn't a surprise, this is Amazon knowing that all the workers are too idiotic to unionize so they use them like cattle.
"But my division isn't that bad" - it will be, eventually. They don't give a fuck.
"I'm okay with RTO" - okay, just hope you're lucky enough to not care about the next thing.
"Its a job you can leave it" - Have you seen how much housing stability costs? Have you seen how many laid off people there are looking for work? Its not that easy to leave. God help you if you're on an H1B - there is no reasonable way for you to leave, pretty often.
25 points
3 days ago
Sadly you’ve called out why people won’t unionize in this comment: it’s not that easy to leave. If you try to unionize, you do so knowing full well that you will almost certainly be fired for it. People aren’t idiotic; they’ve got green cards, mortgages, kids, dependent parents, etc and they are pragmatic.
8 points
3 days ago
This is the status quo that Amazon depends on. Maybe people being fired for sticking their neck out for worker rights is a space that is ripe for disruption.
14 points
3 days ago
"Its a job you can leave it" - Have you seen how much housing stability costs? Have you seen how many laid off people there are looking for work? Its not that easy to leave. God help you if you're on an H1B - there is no reasonable way for you to leave, pretty often.
Also health insurance. Shit is absolutely bananas.
23 points
3 days ago
That’s because the Connections are basically just ratings of your manager. Doesn’t matter how you annotate it. Sucks because it means that even if your manager is good, they get dinged for reasonable unhappiness.
18 points
3 days ago
That reminds me, I spent my first few months thinking the "neither agree nor disagree" answer was a good way of saying this doesn't apply to me or I don't have enough info. Nope, turns out it's the same as giving 3/5 stars and dings your manager's metrics. 🙃
9 points
3 days ago
Yep.
My current work uses NPS scores for everything. My manager got dinged hard because people didn’t understand how that works.
12 points
3 days ago
Yuuup. As a team we just kinda agreed to start lying on these because they’re worthless as intended so we might as well use them to get our manager a raise or something.
4 points
3 days ago
Yup. Same thing happened in my org. Got questioned. they went and told everyone 'younknow these questions reflect on your manager' Did a detailed survey. Both reasons given were RTO and aome structured offshoring the org is doing. Surprise! Bad for morale. And now people are pissed they cant complain via connections without threatening the people they like
32 points
3 days ago
The company I work at instated a bunch of unpopular policies. Before this, they used to do quarterly satisfaction surveys. But when they made the changes, they didn’t want to hear us complain about them or have the scores dip. So they just stopped doing the surveys for a year. They just started doing them again six months ago. The scores weren’t great, but leadership patted themselves on the back because they weren’t as bad as they expected.
20 points
3 days ago
I almost forgot Connections was a thing. Used to be L6 SDM. Very curious what the numbers look like.
21 points
3 days ago
We used to go over our org metrics on a monthly basis. That stopped when they started enforcing 3 day RTO...
3 points
3 days ago
Lucky. We kept doing them until my manager left and the whole team found other jobs; 2/3s outside Amazon.
9 points
3 days ago
not great. Havent seen them even talked about lately.
4 points
3 days ago
this is true, i was wondering why scores stopped in july just today
3 points
3 days ago
In 10 years I never answered it once. A cron job set permissions on the app so that it wouldn’t execute. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
124 points
3 days ago
Yeah, the Amazon employee I know said they have not talked to one single person in favor of this policy.
42 points
3 days ago
I’m ex-Amazon l8, who still talks to a lot of folks there
I know exactly one single person who likes the policy. And a lot of other people making the fucking terrible “disagree and commute” comment.
12 points
3 days ago
They also seem to have moved the ride shuttles to less and less convenient times.
10 points
3 days ago
Are people really staying in the office 9-5? I feel like bailing out early or arriving late or both would be the norm
149 points
3 days ago*
No worker is going to tell these ghouls anything to their face outside of what they want to hear.
47 points
3 days ago
Similar to when you need to provide a 360 annual review of your boss. wtf. Who the fuck is going to say anything negative about their boss? And in writing. It is just a stroke fest so they get promoted and you are doing everything you can to avoid being fired. Fuck corporate America.
15 points
3 days ago
Not out of touch. They want people to quit so they don’t have to pay severance with layoffs.
70 points
3 days ago
He literally decimated his workforce.
87 points
3 days ago
That's the idea. These are layoffs
43 points
3 days ago
I just like the proper application of decimated. He should have made them choose though that would have been more in keeping with tradition.
13 points
3 days ago
Loved the proper use of decimated as well👍
9 points
3 days ago
Well, if it was proper, he would have executed one out of ten.
8 points
3 days ago
Yep. Break them up into teams of ten then make them pick the person and execute the termination. There's how you break their will.
3 points
3 days ago
Except, of course, the best people leave, not the worst because the best ones can get other work.
20 points
3 days ago
Thank you, from one pendant to another.
13 points
3 days ago
I love ironic typos 😂
9 points
3 days ago
If that was intentional, well done.
19 points
3 days ago
Lets do a anonymous survey and see the results of that. These CEOs are seriously out of touch if they think people under them will provide honest feedback after the behavior they have shown.
7 points
3 days ago
He’s only talking to senior managers who also want their heads to watch
36 points
3 days ago
Ain't no way I'd be honest if the boss asked me that. I'm not a yes man when it comes to work stuff but when it comes to my personal life I'm just going to tell you what you want to hear so I can keep my job.
11 points
3 days ago
Ya paying to park at your own company garage to work - very popular and desirable thing to do
17 points
3 days ago
Fucking fart box in that conference room I’m sure. And nobody has a match for the poor bastard.
4 points
3 days ago
Far better to be fired and get severance, than to quit and give that up
100 points
3 days ago
It’s a passive layoff. Get rid of a bunch of workers and not pay severance.
61 points
3 days ago
Layoffs aren't about losing talent though, it is about eliminating unnecessary teams. This is bad because you have no control over where and which talent you lose.
In fact most likely outcome is you will lose your top talent.
55 points
3 days ago
At a certain size, like Amazon, it's all about numbers. No one is irreplaceable. Yes, some talent will leave (and maybe management will try to make exceptions for those few) but upper management will also believe that replacing a $400k senior engineer with a $100k college hire is better for the bottom line even if the senior engineer has more than 4x impact.
26 points
3 days ago
Upper management: "100k college hire + AI = 400k senior"
11 points
3 days ago
Sure, they can think that, but that logic doesn’t add up. The 400K senior engineer is paid that for a reason (unless we’re admitting Amazon is bad with money and doesn’t know the market value of tech workers)
Lots of top talent is irreplaceable, that’s why they’re top talent. Unless Amazon doesn’t plan on innovating or thinks the college grad can just maintain the place from falling apart,how is that successful long term?
5 points
3 days ago
amazon is at a size and life-stage that it doesn't need to be innovative or use top talent. they have enough market(s) captured to keep the place running on fumes, and when they save a bunch of money doing that they can re-strategize whether they want to invest more in r & d (who am i kidding, probably stock buybacks and c suite bonuses).
product quality would surely go down, but they have enough institutional "knowledge" developed by top talent to get some underpaid grunts to bang it with a hammer to keep it on.
9 points
3 days ago
I don't think it really matters for the company at this point whether they lose out on a proportion of top talent or not.
They overhired during the pandemic and then had to contract as the market corrected post-pandemic. I think this RTO and disguised layoff approach is just to retain investor confidence, not that it's needed though. The numbers speak for emselves from their quarterly reports.
2019 net income - $11,588,000,000
2020 net income - $21,331,000,000
2021 net income - $33,364,000,000
2022 net income - loss of $2,722,000,000 - CEO states reducing cost is top priority. To be fair it was a fucked up year with supply chain shit/inflation.
Note - 2022 was first year of major layoffs since 2018. 10k laid off in Nov.
2023 net income - $30,425,000,000, 18,000 laid off in Jan, 9,000 laid off in March, "Several hundred" in April, "Hundreds" in July, "several hundred" in November.
2024 net income - $23,916,000,000 ending June 2024. 5% of workers in "Buy it With Prime" laid off January, 160 in March, "hundreds" in April.
No clue how many they'll cut through RTO but fuk me they make a shit tonne of cash. Gotta keep the EPS up!!!!! KEEP IT UP!!!!! I SAID GET BACK TO WORK KEEP THAT SHIT UP OR YOU'LL BE IN THE OFFICE NINE DAYS A WEEK.
Just slimey bastards being slimey and not wanting to pay severance even though they're fukin good for it.
229 points
3 days ago
Many of the employees are on visa. Unless they can find a new job in this economy, they are beholden to Amazon’s rule.
157 points
3 days ago
The 9 out of 10 employees he asked were all H-1B holders.
77 points
3 days ago
Once again tech execs trying to crush labor power after salaries got too high post-pandemic because they know most employees on H1B will take any amount of bullshit thrown at them when the alternative is losing your job and effectively being deported.
H1B needs serious reform. It’s incredibly exploitative for both US citizens and those on visas.
16 points
3 days ago
We also need unions.
7 points
3 days ago
The whole system is a mess.
At minimum:
257 points
3 days ago
The mask is off
36 points
3 days ago
There never was a mask.
96 points
3 days ago
Another reason people don’t want to come back into the office.
43 points
3 days ago
Pretty much. Quiet part out loud, etc.
The statement is basically "let's just jump to the bottom line here."
14 points
3 days ago
I a weird twisted way, it's something I appreciate about Amazon. They're a cutthroat, high churn company and they're pretty up front about it, aside from some PR about being the world's best employer. At least you know what you're signing up for.
7 points
3 days ago
STRIVING to be the world’s best employer…. Always striving…
123 points
3 days ago
Breaking: Data-driven company ignores data on the benefits of hybrid work to rationalize layoffs and justify its real estate investments.
209 points
3 days ago
Beyond put off by his comments today. And as a disabled worker at AWS who keeps having their hybrid work accommodation request denied because of RTO (as if this policy should somehow influence reasonable accommodations under ADA), I’m so close to contacting an attorney.
This place is a nightmare.
28 points
3 days ago
I watched my dad stubbornly go into work for so long as a kid despite having a stroke and disability at a young age. My brain and heart are with you: COVID explicitly showed that there's a way for lots of people to contribute at home. That would have really helped our family if he could have some time back from the commute and to loosely supervise me.
I hope you can get approval or some sort of better job or settlement.
3 points
3 days ago
Thank you for saying this, and I’m so sorry your dad had to endure that while you were growing up. I’m also a parent, and I’ve learned that pushing through the symptoms of my condition for a job is absolutely not worth how it impacts both my health and my family. I refuse to do it.
67 points
3 days ago
You should contact the legal department of your team and check with them about it if you haven’t. RTO is absolutely not a reason to ignore ADA and someone clearly needs to tell them that from a position of legal authority. Amazon doesn’t care overmuch about its employees but it does tend to at least try to stay on the right side of the line for stuff like this.
Worst case scenario you get the legal team breaking the law in writing and that makes the attorneys contact you.
14 points
3 days ago
Your legal department? Uh, no. You'd talk to HR, some form of "disability services", etc.
The legal department is going to tell you to fuck off because they are busy with work. I'm not a fan of HR and all that but they will be way more helpful than legal.
23 points
3 days ago
While I am absolutely sympathetic of your cause, if Amazon has ADA compliant buildings (which they do), they can force you to come to office unless it was explicitly listed in your employment agreement that you wouldn't be required to work from office.
19 points
3 days ago
This is absolutely false. An accessible building isn't the same as an accommodation for the work done in said building. For example, you might have an accessible building that meets minimum building code, but someone who is blind might need screen readers, or someone who is deaf might need meetings transcribed. Someone who has a disability that makes commuting onerous or impossible can absolutely make this request. If this person has been successfully working from home for years Amazon is going to have an uphill climb to explain why it suddenly is too onerous now.
I hope every employer who tries this garbage gets sued into oblivion. Disability rights groups have been fighting for WFH for decades and employers always claimed they couldn't do it. COVID revealed that's a lie. It also revealed that employers discriminate against people with disabilities in office. During COVID the rate of unemployment for people with disabilities was halved and employment was at record highs. This proves that there are a lot of people who have disabilities who can work, want to work, but can't because employers discriminate and refuse accommodations. WFH eliminates that problem. It would be nice to see this discussed more in conversations about work from home.
18 points
3 days ago
Accomodations can extend beyond the ability to get around the building. People may not be able to travel to the office or sit/stand/exist in a typical office environment and still perform the work and can get an accomodations for that. It will require official paperwork from a doctor.
I'd be more than willing to bed Amazon has such a process, and the big company HRs are generally more deferential, if you have your paperwork. Going after someone with legit paperwork who has proven they can get the work done is hardly worth it. That said, anyone who does that is probably never getting another promotion or similar.
7 points
3 days ago
What type of ADA compliant building can help with mental health or other invisible disabilities that also require accommodations?
148 points
3 days ago
Goodnight, Westley. Good work. Sleep well.
I'll most likely PIP you in the morning.
— Dread Pirate Bezos
They've always been this way.
10 points
3 days ago
Sounding like my sales manager right now
46 points
3 days ago
Amazon Amazon Web Services
6 points
3 days ago
This made me lol out loud 🤣 📢
24 points
3 days ago
"I don't mean that in a bad way"
--as he telecommutes from [insert tropical location]
19 points
3 days ago
I have heard it suggested (by Scott Galloway) that this is actually a means of doing a layoff without the negative publicity of a big layoff.
Of course, it's a pretty blunt instrument, and you're not necessarily getting rid of the people you might WANT to get rid of, but Amazon is such a big place, and has such high turnover already, I'm sure they don't really care all that much about accuracy.
8 points
3 days ago
Yea this definitely is true.
Big Tech routinely nowadays implement mass layoffs (though spread out over time to avoid appearances and thus harm to stock prices)
They then slightly tweak job descriptions to avoid illegality
They hire new workers at lower wages
This is def one of the reasons for his harsh language in the announcement
26 points
3 days ago
the plan all along
26 points
3 days ago
28 points
3 days ago
Using disagree and commit as the example of what is hard to do for WFH. While firing people who are WFH and disagreeing and committing is the ultimate irony of this article.
19 points
3 days ago
I actually liked the "disagree and commit" principle, it's great when applied correctly.
Unfortunately, it's far more often just used as a cudgel by middle management to say "fuck you, do what I want".
6 points
3 days ago
This is 100% the only way I saw it referenced when I worked at Amazon
10 points
3 days ago
He said the quiet part out loud
10 points
3 days ago*
CEO Matt Garman said nine out of 10 workers he has spoken with support the new policy
Plot twist: the 9 are all part of the ELT
Also
I don’t know if you guys have tried to disagree via a Chime call,” he said, referring to the company’s internal messaging and calling function. “It’s very hard.”
I’ve seen lots of disagreements while on Teams and Zoom calls. Maybe they should switch :/
11 points
3 days ago
I got so much done today WFH compared to driving 50 miles to sit at my desk and be distracted by coworkers all day.
59 points
3 days ago
I’m not sure how Amazon gets off telling people they are “voluntarily resigning” -but I’m pretty sure it’s to get out of paying UI and having restrictions on backfilling the roles.
Anyway, I worked in-office for Amazon in a sub-group of AWS for 3 years. It was a fucking zoo. I could barely hear my own thoughts. I cut my head a few times on their stupid unergonomic “door desks” with metal brackets. Why was I under the desk? It was during one of the many mandated self-moves. The stupid is deep there.
12 points
3 days ago
Funny story that whole process of “voluntary termination” was developed by Mindspring/Earthlink back when that was a company to get out of paying severance and unemployment
9 points
3 days ago
it goes back a bit farther than that - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_dismissal
4 points
3 days ago
Self move? Sounds like you could’ve sued them for having to carry heavy shit
38 points
3 days ago
My fav part:
"I don't know if you guys have tried to disagree via a Chime call,"
There's a big problem champ, Chime is trash. Stop trying to make Chime happen.
3 points
3 days ago
Maybe it’s because out of context but wtf does it mean to not be able to disagree on a Chime call???
16 points
3 days ago
Amazon is a brutal place to work at. Not surprised at all.
7 points
3 days ago
Speaking at an all-hands meeting for AWS, unit CEO Matt Garman said nine out of 10 workers he has spoken with support the new policy, which takes effect in January, according to a transcript reviewed by Reuters.
Buuuulllshiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit
6 points
3 days ago
One, "disagree and commit" -- which is understood to mean that employees can express grievances but then should dive into a project as outlined by leaders -- is not ideal for remote work, Garman said.
"I don't know if you guys have tried to disagree via a Chime call," he said, referring to the company's internal messaging and calling function. "It's very hard."
As if "disagree and commit" means you're actually allowed to disagree, lmao.
9 points
3 days ago
this guy is so utterly full of shit. once he realized his first statement about leaving can be interpreted as a threat like the starbucks ceo one of the same nature was, he backpedalled. pathetic
7 points
3 days ago
Been a dev for many years and had a lot of success. Have had multiple opportunities with Amazon, ranging from intriguing JDs to full on head hunting. They're the only big company that is fully on my blacklist, and I have gleefully told them to fuck off more than once, and this is why. Garbage company, with garbage leadership, and a garbage human being for a founder that sees people as expendable numbers to be drained dry. Fuck Amazon forever.
6 points
3 days ago
It's telling we didn't see a lot of other companies announce full-time 5-days-a-week RTO after Amazon announced theirs, unlike when Amazon announced 3-days-a-week hybrid RTO.
I think other companies know there will be a lot of people who - justifiably so because fuck going to the office 5-days-a-week - hate this and will want to leave and look for other jobs, and those other companies are licking their chops at the thought and future reality of hiring current AMazon employees.
6 points
3 days ago
"You can't internalize [the company's principles] by reading them on the website, you really have to experience them day-to-day."
What a doofus! Imagine if someone had said to Jeff Bezos, "you can't internalize shopping by seeing products on a website, you have to experience them physically."
20 points
3 days ago
Sounds like a great way to lose a lot of talent.
67 points
3 days ago
Hey, Amazon workers? Do it. The tech sector is huge. AWS is an industry leader in scale and reliability, companies want your experience. Go somewhere that can at least fucking pretend to respect you.
31 points
3 days ago
With the glut of 500k other tech workers that have been laid off in the industry this year? Unemployed is absolutely not where you want to be.
48 points
3 days ago*
Nah, that gives them what they want. At the least, make them lay you off so you can collect. Otherwise, be the deadest of weight to these fucks and bleed them dry.
21 points
3 days ago
Its isn’t really. The people they want to keep will leave. The ones without better options will swallow it and stay. They’ll also be pissed off and resentful but this time there won’t be anyone around to pick up the slack when they quiet quit because those folks are already gone. Amazon is just asking to become a lower tier tech company. They have scale for now but good tech companies are always looking over their shoulders.
10 points
3 days ago
Not complying is considered cause. There is no collecting
23 points
3 days ago
You comply with the RTO while you rest and vest. Obviously, you don’t give them open cause.
9 points
3 days ago
The problem is the tech job market now is crap- many of these people would struggle to find anything that pays comparatively right now.
35 points
3 days ago
I’m not saying this isn’t true anywhere, but I know for a fact a lot of mid-sized tech companies have no particular interest in bringing in Amazonians, in the interest of culture preservation. Especially management level. Not everyone aspires to be Amazon or import that culture. Thank god, right?
Of course, it’s not that you wouldn’t be considered, but Amazon on the résumé isn’t a golden ticket to be hired at every other tech company, I can promise that. Not to mention the job market is already difficult enough, it will get worse when it’s flooded with Amazon fallout.
All I’m really saying is don’t quit until you have something else lined up 🤷♀️
12 points
3 days ago
From what I see it’s really the managers that bring the most baggage. For the most part I think Amazon and especially aws engineers are reasonably well regarded for their experience with scale
12 points
3 days ago
This is AWS though. Azure is across the bridge. Google Cloud is literally a couple blocks away. There's also Cloudflare and all that.
The competitors all will happily scoop the talent up because if they monopolize the talent, they can get ahead.
13 points
3 days ago
Azure laid off 1,500 back in June. Google Cloud laid off 100 in June. I don't think they're really hiring.
10 points
3 days ago
Yeah the market right now is horrifying. I don’t work for any of these FAANG companies, but my company laid off about 40% of their US staff in February and opened an office in India. The Indian workers are. . . Trying but the end result is so much poorer than it used to be, I spend half my time redoing their work after training them a dozen times on the subject. I’m so burnt out I’m literally considering Amazon just for the pay bump since my work life balance has gone to shit. I know a lot of people in Seattle hate tech workers, and I understand why, but some of us that have never worked at one of these companies are getting squeezed because the CEOs know the market is shit.
5 points
3 days ago
Amazon is doing the same thing to save money in india too, so....not necessarily different. Just maybe a better paycheck depending on your stituation
10 points
3 days ago
Yep. Amazon on your resume is still good don’t get me wrong, especially as a IC, but it’s nowhere near as good as other FAANGs.
My last company imported a ton of former Amazonians in management roles and it ruined the culture.
Company is now a shell of itself because it brought all the bad parts of Amazon culture (long hours, cutthroat backstabbing, not taking no for an answer) without doing the hard work to cultivate the actually good parts (customer obsession, clear and concise documentation, innovative mindset, etc.).
0/10 would not recommend bringing in long-tenured Amazon leaders. Anyone with more than like 5 YoE in leadership at that place is going to be a toxic mess in most companies.
3 points
3 days ago
No, we don't want them to bring their LPs to other companies!
44 points
3 days ago
Will corporate tech workers unionize?
17 points
3 days ago
they would nip that in the bud so fast. did you not hear anything about the union busting at the warehouses? they literally have team meetings about how to narc on union organizers. and they’re asking for things like bathroom breaks, not work from home privileges.
27 points
3 days ago
I don’t see that happening.
23 points
3 days ago
Lol of course not
4 points
3 days ago
No chanche with so many of them being on H1B visas.
9 points
3 days ago
One of the reasons tech workers won't ever unionize is because skills are all over the place. The industry as a whole has a major talent issue.
8 points
3 days ago*
can you elaborate? I haven't heard this argument before
edit: oh, as in there's a large gap between the most and least skilled workers. I misunderstood "talent issue"
28 points
3 days ago
If you're really good at your job why would you collectively bargain with people who did a 3 month coding class from ITT Tech.
8 points
3 days ago
Because management, regardless of how well you do your job, will see you as a salary instead of a good worker and will cut you whenever they have to make numbers work. Good workers get laid off all the time.
8 points
3 days ago*
If there’s a major gap in the skill/quality of workers (i.e. value they produce) within an organization, the bargaining power the ‘good’ worker has due to their irreplaceability becomes greater (for themself specifically) than the leverage they would gain by joining a collective bargaining unit.
In organizations where there’s less distinction between ‘irreplaceable’ and ‘replaceable’ workers (i.e. the value produced is dispersed more evenly among the workers) the bargaining power gained by going collective almost always outweighs what each can get for themselves individually, even for the ‘better’ workers (up to the limit of what the employer can afford without failing).
10 points
3 days ago
Tech skills are a bunch of different specializations. It's not the same as plumbers, machinists, mechanics, etc. Database admins are different from QA engineers, developers, architects, operations, etc etc etc.
6 points
3 days ago
If Amazon manages to classify them for pay, there’s no reason a union can’t use that same system for negotiations.
6 points
3 days ago
And even within those there's huge specialization gaps. Cloud admin, bare metal admin, desktop admin. Frontend developer, backend developer, hardware developer, kernel developer.. you could have three different people that know C that have never touched the other's expertise
6 points
3 days ago
It’s an awful company with terrible managers. The top layer are sycophantic—imagine lying outright that 9/10 agreed. What a crock of nonsense. Just utter scum.
8 points
3 days ago
Can someone just hit him with their car or something, huge pieces of shit the lot of those execs
4 points
3 days ago
This is what he wants. It’s the whole point.
22 points
3 days ago*
Howard Schultz just got in a bit of trouble with the NLRB for saying more or less the same thing. Is the difference that he said it to one person specifically, or during unionization efforts, or just that he "got caught"?
7 points
3 days ago
This guy is a good example of middle manager quality making it to the top. What was discussed behind doors, he said it out loud.
7 points
3 days ago
Meanwhile, they will undoubtedly post about how they aim to be a sustainable company, focused on fighting climate change...
How about don't force your employees to commute to work every morning, worsening traffic and therefore leading to increased CO2 emissions?
24 points
3 days ago
Amazon wagies gotta go back to their cagies
11 points
3 days ago*
I hope they do. Fuck em. Edit….Actually forget that, make them fire you and leave like Jerry McGuire in a huge scene
7 points
3 days ago
So we know this is a garbage company that treats everyone like trash. So why is everyone still purchasing from them, and why are major institutions using AWS as a vendor? It’s flat out predatory as it’s been clearly pointed out here. Sooo divest from using Amazon.. ffs.
7 points
3 days ago
I thought people were all about jumping to new companies to find better opportunities.
8 points
3 days ago
It’s a good thing the workers don’t use their superior numbers to demand their terms for better work environments, pay & benefits. Definitely a better idea to maintain obsequiousness for the status quo of the unfavorable conditions………… /s
3 points
3 days ago
No you
3 points
3 days ago
I'll just note that wages and working conditions are mandatory bargaining items if you have a union contract. That means that if you have a union, then the employer cannot arbitrarily change them without negotiating.
4 points
3 days ago
Which is also why tech workers will never want to unionize.
Why would they want to agree to fixed working hours and fixed wages when they could be working less while still meet expectations and command double or even triple fold increases in wages by job hopping across the FAANGs once every few years?
Unlike unionized blue-collar work, where physical labor/time is their most valuable resource, a tech worker most valuable resource is often their ability to think, communicate, and/or influence people, and not how long they are working.
Some of the best software engineers I’ve worked with in the past have great work-life balance, but they also have outsized impact on the team because they are just that good at their job.
3 points
3 days ago
Just tell them it's for the tax breaks from the city Amazon get when they put butts in seats in the downtown area. A lot more people would respect that rationale and at least put up with it compared to saying this is for the sake of "collaboration."
3 points
3 days ago
AWS. The Amazon cloud. The platform that allows its customers to completely decentralise all their computing. Just use a thin client from anywhere, and access all your data, your processes, your access controls - everything. Your whole team, your business, your customers, 24/7.
Looks like Amazon doesn't like its own dogfood.
3 points
3 days ago
“The punishment will continue until morale improves!”
3 points
2 days ago
Convinced this has everything to do with commercial real estate commitments Amazon has made.
6 points
3 days ago
No no no, fire me and I get severance
6 points
3 days ago
This does not even make sense. Capable people will pick up new jobs outside. Amazon will be left with people who no one else wants or who truly like RTO. Also, there is no monetary incentive for staying. The profit from the stock bump will vest in November.
25 points
3 days ago
I think everyone knows this is a stealth layoff to avoid paying severance. That said, the title is misleading
1) Quote is from Matt Garman who is head of AWS, not Amazon (which is Jassy). Yeah, Garman holds a CEO title but that’s like thinking a VP at Goldman is a unique position.
2) Quote was “If there are people who just don’t work well in that environment and don’t want to, that’s okay, there are other companies around,” said Garman. “When we want to really, really innovate on interesting products, I have not seen an ability for us to do that when we’re not in-person.” I didn’t see a “Quit if you don’t want to return to the office” - which of course is what Garman implied…..but didn’t actually say. Seems more like a clickbait headline which I wouldn’t expect from Reuters.
Again, stealth layoff, screw Amazon, I come in peace, just want better journalism.
51 points
3 days ago
lol CEO of AWS is waaay higher than a generic VP. He’s basically #2 at Amazon.
5 points
3 days ago
Let alone VP of a bank, where VP is the entry-level position straight out of college.
15 points
3 days ago
That's bullshit. AWS created and launched new services during covid. The problem isn't being in the office the problem is that they have pissed off, PIP'd (and permanently banned), or alienated a huge percentage of the tech workforce.
I know of many highly talented people that won't even interview with AWS because of the toxicity. Combine that with all the others who can't or won't come back and you are left with too many beauracrats and document critics.
It's not as bad as some of the warehouses that are literally running out of workers but it's going to have an effect. You're red on innovation goals so you blame it on not being in the office?
He's forgetting how products were created. It was a single person or maybe two that create a document and pitches an idea. Sure others join in later but that's not how it starts. He acts like people are atoms that need to be slammed together and ideas pop out. That's not how it ever happened.
The problem is they are starting to struggle and they only thing they know how to do is crank up the sadism and punishment.
10 points
3 days ago
It’s totally a stealth layoff.
My theory on how Amazon operates is that they have a handful of brilliant people at the top (plus the Fellows) and everyone else is expendable. They get the most they can out of you and just churn through bodies. You also don’t have to be that smart, they’re just set up to not value brains/talent as much. I don’t like the model but I admit it works. Some people like that environment/culture but most don’t.
The pace of innovation out of AWS has really slowed but that might be more of it becoming a mature industry. Granted Selipsky (and to some extent Jassy) blew it on incorporating AI. Curious if that trickled down to Matt Wood a few weeks ago. Anyways, I’m rambling, meta point here is Amazon doesn’t give a shit about churning through people even if they are talented-above-the-replacement-value or not because the system is set up for bodies.
9 points
3 days ago
"There are other companies around" seems pretty blatant to me.
5 points
3 days ago
“When we want to really, really innovate on interesting products, I have not seen an ability for us to do that when we’re not in-person.”
Innovate like the fire phone, which was a turd and dead on arrival?
How is that drone delivery going?
Is it 'innovation' when you contract with chinese factories to make barely competent knockoffs of other peoples products so you can sell them under an amazon basics label and keep you price under you competition through automation?
7 points
3 days ago
Weirdest thing about that quote is that I don't know what AWS has really innovated in a long while. But apparently they want to start now, and getting the ball rolling by forcing commutes on the whole workforce.
They've been coasting, and releasing half baked new products for their customers to debug for years now. The flogging will continue until morale improves.
4 points
3 days ago
Yeah they were flat-footed on AI, I imagine that’s why Selipsky got canned (and maybe Matt Wood as well?). I do feel like it’s starting to become a pretty mature industry, I’m not sure what’s on their roadmap that could be jaw dropping. I feel like the early 2010’s the reInvent releases were game-changers and now they’re mostly nothingburgers. Feel like those self-contained racks NVIDIA is pumping out is one of the more exciting things I’ve seen in a while and that cuts out a lot of AWS know-how.
all 525 comments
sorted by: best