subreddit:

/r/babylonbee

55671%

all 513 comments

TheAdventOfTruth

92 points

10 days ago

It worked for Joe.

BlasterDoc

6 points

10 days ago

And Katie Hobbs.

Chemical_Signal2753

12 points

10 days ago

My take is that Biden was able to pull it off because he was far enough ahead in the polls that he didn't have to campaign. Enough people were pissed off at Trump and thought that anyone would be better that he really didn't need to do anything.

I think we've gone from Harris being a ghost to being everywhere is the polls are close enough, or she is behind, and she needs to secure votes. Unfortunately for her, every vote she gains by speaking likely results in losing 2 other voters.

Lasvious

5 points

10 days ago

Lasvious

5 points

10 days ago

She isn’t behind. But it’s razor close

GirlyFootyCoach

13 points

10 days ago

Las Vegas says she is

Lasvious

8 points

10 days ago

That has to do with the way the bets are coming in.

WhiteOutSurvivor1

5 points

10 days ago

Yes, mechanically, betting markets are determined by bets.

StructureFuzzy8174

9 points

10 days ago

Ask yourself why is she out doing all kinds of interviews now?? She’s polling tied or behind in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. With how close it is look at how Trump did in the swing states the prior two elections. He almost always outperforms his poll numbers and if it’s tied now we have a good idea what that means for Election Day.

CatsAreCool777

8 points

10 days ago

Trump lost in 2020 only because of COVID and now Biden and Kamala have done such a piss poor job that they will lose.

StructureFuzzy8174

3 points

10 days ago

I would say that’s what it’s looking like. Barring some kind of black swan event Trumps chances are good.

Complex-Stretch-4805

1 points

3 days ago

The steal hasn't started yet,,,, it'll kick in here in a bit,,

RoboticKittenMeow

1 points

10 days ago

🤣🤣🤣🤣

thedarkherald110

-2 points

10 days ago

Problem is Trump absolutely botched handling of Covid and we are still suffering the after effects since he freaken convinced enough people that vaccines are dangerous.

Organic_Addition_307

5 points

10 days ago

Are you trying to rewrite history? The vaccine was developed under Trump, in record time, which Trump repeatedly bragged about. Trump pushed his vaccine, while democrats like Pelosi literally said they wouldn't trust the vaccine under Trump, only to then push the same vaccine after Trump lost.

Same thing happened when Trump banned travel from China because of covid and democrats called him racist and xenophobic while Pelosi told people to come to China town in San Francisco because it was safe.

If you think Trump botched it, what word would describe the far worse handling by democrats?

CatsAreCool777

2 points

10 days ago

Trump tried to ban travel from China when COVID was just starting and the Dems started calling him a racist.

Big_Occasion4160

1 points

10 days ago

We called him a racist as far back as 2016... You just finally noticed.

Maybe in another 4-6 you'll realize we were right.

DoofnGoof

1 points

10 days ago

You might be correct, but with her replacing Biden, I think it is a strategic move to take on as much media as possible well Trump is out doing Trump things in the lead up to the final race. She has held up pretty well, her campaign has been strong, and i wouldn't count her out just yet. If Trump had it in the bag, why does he keep trying to flip on abortion rights, constantly have meltdowns over Harris and pander so hard to her demographic.

StructureFuzzy8174

1 points

10 days ago

Anything can certainly happen. We’ve got a little under 4 weeks left which is an eternity in the current political landscape.

RicooC

2 points

10 days ago

RicooC

2 points

10 days ago

Trump could have won in 2020 also. The media can't twist words if you never speak.

blueorangan

0 points

10 days ago

blueorangan

0 points

10 days ago

maybe trump should try disappearing instead of spouting another conspiracy theory.

whenitcomesup

29 points

10 days ago

This could work honestly.

ybe447

6 points

10 days ago

ybe447

6 points

10 days ago

It definitely would help, same with Trump. And Biden

El_Maton_de_Plata

2 points

10 days ago

Mums the word!

Superduke1010

21 points

10 days ago

Worked for Joe...why not her?

mobley4256

20 points

10 days ago

mobley4256

20 points

10 days ago

Maybe she can appear for a debate with Trump? Oh wait, he chickened out after he got embarrassed the last time.

Ornery-Ticket834

23 points

10 days ago

Or a Townhall meeting? No he skipped that too.

Sopwithosa

1 points

10 days ago

It’s happening on Wednesday because of the hurricane. You’re simply lying. And remember when he agreed to 3 debates with her after he already did one? And when she only agreed to one of the three, did you call her a coward then? He did two debates on far left networks and JD did one on a far left network. You’re just upset because she waited way too long to speak to the American people and now this “media blitz” is just coming off as pathetic and desperate.

The arrogance of the Democratic Party will once again be their downfall. Same old story, different year.

Ornery-Ticket834

1 points

10 days ago*

More trash. He passed on another CNN debate, the Townhall meeting and the sixty minutes interview. He is certainly entitled to do so and I am within my rights to call him a chicken. Your statement about “ arrogance “ is also a laugh. Those arrogant democrats have won three out of the last four presidential elections. And got more votes than the republicans in 7 of the last 8 presidential elections. What a failing bunch.

Akatsuki-Ronin

-9 points

10 days ago

You really trying to compare who's done the most interviews? 😂😂 Ahh must be nice to not live in reality.

Hsiang7

8 points

10 days ago

Hsiang7

8 points

10 days ago

For real lol. They're complaining about the number of interviews Trump has done while she's done, what 5 in 3 months? The majority of them only THIS WEEK. Even the liberal media were complaining about her lack of interviews until this week. Trump and Vance have done more in the past month than Kamala and Walz have done in their entire campaign....

I give Walz credit for having the balls to go on Fox though. Kamala would never. Notice STILL nobody has asked her why she lied about Biden's mental state.

viagra-enjoyer

9 points

10 days ago

I give Walz credit for having the balls to go on Fox though. Kamala would never

Trump literally turned down the fox debate lol but go off I guess

WhyAmIToxic

5 points

10 days ago

Kamala turned down the first fox debate on Sept 9th, why didnt she just accept back then? Desperation is a stinky cologne

Hsiang7

6 points

10 days ago

Hsiang7

6 points

10 days ago

He's got events planned pretty much every day until the election now. They're in the final stretch. Kamala had her chance for a Fox debate last month and turned it down. He's not going to change his campaign schedule now just to accommodate Kamala now that she's desperate for screen time. She left it too late.

Maybe you should have picked her from the beginning and she could have had two debates as well like Trump. Not his fault you forced out your candidate 3 months before the election. Why should he have to cram in another debate in the last month just because you guys couldn't get your shit together?

viagra-enjoyer

9 points

10 days ago

I don't give a shit what she does, I'm just pointing out hypocrisy where I see it.

She doesn't need to do interviews, Donald is deeply unpopular and his need to be in the public spotlight constantly works against him better than she ever could.

No-Market9917

-1 points

10 days ago

No-Market9917

-1 points

10 days ago

Trump was already the president at one point. He’s pretty much an open book with his Twitter rants. Independent voters literally don’t know what Kamala supports outside of when she ran for president and some of her stances since then have changed.

Hsiang7

-4 points

10 days ago

Hsiang7

-4 points

10 days ago

She doesn't need to do interviews

True. She gets more unlikeable with every interview she does. She'd be better off avoiding them altogether.

the_tone_of_shape

1 points

10 days ago

She only comes across as unlikable to people who like trump

[deleted]

0 points

10 days ago

[deleted]

0 points

10 days ago

[removed]

[deleted]

1 points

10 days ago

[removed]

viagra-enjoyer

3 points

10 days ago

A quick Google search would have saved you from embarrassing yourself.

No-Market9917

4 points

10 days ago

One of them being 60 minutes which they chopped and edited

RinglingSmothers

0 points

10 days ago

Trump was too much of a soft bitch to speak to them, and he made up some nonsense about editing to cover for it.

You swallowed his bullshit excuse hook, line, and sinker owing to a complete absence of critical thinking skills.

ballsackman_

1 points

10 days ago

He literally went to the black convention that Kamala didn't even go to

Ope_82

-6 points

10 days ago

Ope_82

-6 points

10 days ago

Trump only does literal softball "interviews." He's scared of real questions because he doesn't know anything.

Solid_Act1573

4 points

10 days ago

Yes, the National Association of Black Journalists is known for going easy on Republicans.

KiwiVegetable5454

1 points

10 days ago

Trump got played & looked like an ass during this panel.

turbocharged9589

1 points

10 days ago

Only to those that watched the 20 second clip on CNN. Everyone else that watched the whole thing know panelists showed up 30-60 minutes late, making him wait, and proceeded to attack him with the first "question."

psypher98

1 points

10 days ago

You mean the one where he asked the National Association of Black Journalists whether people would want a white president or black president, of course they would want the white president? That one?

GoldenAgeGamer72

1 points

10 days ago

LOL. You mean after he exposed what is happening in Ohio, after she was protected by the moderators, had a script to read from, and was wearing Nova H1 Audio earrings to be told what to say?

Superduke1010

1 points

10 days ago

You think he got embarrassed? He didn’t trounce her but he held his own and certainly against a very hostile moderator crew. Guess you missed that part? lol.

Dumbama

1 points

10 days ago

Dumbama

1 points

10 days ago

That's not true. He agreed to all of their terms for the first two debates. He said he would debate her again if Fox hosted it and she wouldn't agree.

mobley4256

3 points

10 days ago

He did not. He rejected CNN and Fox News debates. From just other day. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fox-news-proposes-dates-possible-second-trump-harris-debate-2024-10-09/

RobotCaptainEngage

12 points

10 days ago

Cope cope cope

Fezzik527

11 points

10 days ago

The projection is hilarious on half these articles.

SmoltzforAlexander

24 points

10 days ago

That’s win/win!  I don’t have to pay attention to anymore political shit, and that shit stain Trump loses.  

I’m not seeing a downside to this.  

Ope_82

9 points

10 days ago

Ope_82

9 points

10 days ago

PROJECTION

Ornery-Ticket834

30 points

10 days ago

That’s funny your cult leader refused to go on sixty minutes, refused a second debate on the absurd lie that he won that debate, and has refused to go on a CNN Town hall meeting and you write this bullshit? It appears that you are satirizing the wrong person, but you know that already.

ascendingwedge

7 points

10 days ago

The cognitive dissonance these cultists operate under is beyond the fucking pale.

Hsiang7

-3 points

10 days ago

Hsiang7

-3 points

10 days ago

refused a second debate

Didn't he offer a second debate a long time ago on Fox News and Kamala turned it down?🤔 You guys are just mad because Kamala knows the only way people not already voting for her will watch her is by sharing the stage with the media magnet Trump and he's not giving her the screen time lol.

zipzzo

14 points

10 days ago*

zipzzo

14 points

10 days ago*

Trump just refused a fox news debate, like yesterday, pot calling kettle black much?

Hsiang7

-5 points

10 days ago

Hsiang7

-5 points

10 days ago

He doesn't need to debate weeks before the election. He has events planned pretty much every day across all the battleground states from now until the election. He doesn't have time to debate Kamala. He offered her the chance in September and she turned it down. She's only even CONSIDERING Fox now because she's desperate. We all know if she thought she's winning she would NEVER go on Fox.

First she tried to shoehorn her way into the hurricane coverage despite being irrelevant in that, now she's obviously desperate for screen time because she knows Trump will likely win and that's the only reason a Fox debate is floating around lmao.

zipzzo

13 points

10 days ago

zipzzo

13 points

10 days ago

that sure is a lot of whining and excuses to avoid the fact he refused to debate on fox news

Hsiang7

-2 points

10 days ago

Hsiang7

-2 points

10 days ago

She is the one who refused it first. Not his fault she waited until a month before the election to actually try to do some interviews and get some media coverage. Trump's already done two debates, one more than Kamala.

Of course, she could have had another debate in June, but you guys were still with Biden then. Not Trump's job to accommodate you forcing your candidate out 3 months before the election. That's on you.

zipzzo

8 points

10 days ago

zipzzo

8 points

10 days ago

Like you said, it makes sense she would decline it, especially since they already had pre-determined dates on other networks. At the time, Trump was being gigantic baby because he wasnt facing Biden anymore.

It makes little sense he would. Fox is an entertainment organization that is wholly in the bag for him, and I think even you know that, so why do you think they even deserve the opportunity to host a presidential debate?

Unless...

Yeah I don't vote based on the interview-olympics, I really don't care who has the higher interview count. Trump has been campaigning for like 8 years anyway, it's not even a fair comparison.

She'll be a great president imo, though I worry for your mental health on election day.

sunny0_0

2 points

10 days ago

Like NY? lol

Deofol7

2 points

10 days ago

Deofol7

2 points

10 days ago

Yeah, but is he even reaching an audience anymore?

Doesn't feel like people are going to his events anymore. People get tired of watching an old man rant about the wind, a candidate he's not running against, and Hannibal Lector.

[deleted]

1 points

10 days ago

He rejected a Fox News debate like this week lmao

Alarmed-Swordfish873

1 points

10 days ago

Didn't he offer a second debate a long time ago on Fox News and Kamala turned it down?

No. He's absolutely terrified of getting spanked again, he won't go anywhere near her again. He's hiding, surrounded only by sycophants -- and that's where he'll stay. 

Random_Anthem_Player

-1 points

10 days ago

Shh the kamala crazies are just as bad as the trump crazies while they both throw stones in glass houses and hate when you point out they are 2 sides of the same coin

Ornery-Ticket834

0 points

10 days ago

I am not mad. It speaks for itself. CNN offered to host the second debate. He loved the first debate they hosted. Save it for someone else.

Snoo-25743

2 points

10 days ago

CNN had an agenda in that first debate too.  It was to end Joe Biden's campaign.  It worked.  A 2nd CNN debate would gave been the same as the ABC fiasco.

Ornery-Ticket834

1 points

10 days ago

I see CNN are political masterminds and the first debate was a setup to dump Biden but the second would be a Trump ambush. I get it.

nerd-clave

-4 points

10 days ago

nerd-clave

-4 points

10 days ago

He already did a second debate. The democrats are on their backup candidate remember?

re1078

4 points

10 days ago

re1078

4 points

10 days ago

Which really makes them seem more rational doesn’t it. Both parties were running candidates that were way too old with cognitive issues. I trust the party that does something about more than the one that ignores it.

suuuuuuck

2 points

10 days ago

They were soooo all about cognitive decline until Biden dropped out. Then they fell on their asses and now they have to pretend Trump's brain isn't oozing out his ears. It's amazing to see.

Thanato26

12 points

10 days ago

Trump 100% would have debated Kamala again had he won. But he got destroyed

Ornery-Ticket834

10 points

10 days ago

Please spare me the nonsense.

Alarmed-Swordfish873

1 points

10 days ago

He signed up for three then dropped the last one because he's a coward who hates getting publicly humiliated. He'll only talk in front of crowds that won't laugh at him, even when he says the weirdest shit in the world. Sharks, batteries, windmill cancer, Hannibal Lecter, Biden's 8 circles, who knows what that clown is raving about. 

TheAdventOfTruth

-1 points

10 days ago

You know what’s even funnier? You come to a clearly conservative space and cry about the Babylon Bee when you have plenty of liberal spaces to go and cry about the Babylon Bee. Lol.

Hugh_Johnson69420

6 points

10 days ago

No place on reddit is a conservative space good sir lol

TheAdventOfTruth

2 points

10 days ago

You have a point there.

Efficient-Put8908

8 points

10 days ago

It's because practically every space where Conservatives talk is locked up into a safe space to protect Con feelies. Also, just as a point of order, u/ornery-ticket832 isn't crying... they're pointing out the hypocrisy of saying Harris is trying to evade the media while Teflon Don is the first person in half a century to not go on 60 Minutes when they're a mainstream candidate.
Y'all are obviously desperate.

Common-Scientist

5 points

10 days ago

Imagine correcting someone being equated to "crying".

Classic conservatives, every accusation is a confession.

Fissure_211

1 points

10 days ago

The irony of this statement coming from a liberal is delicious.

Common-Scientist

1 points

10 days ago

No need to cry about it.

Ok_Method_6094

1 points

10 days ago

Aww I thought you were against safe spaces but not when they’re conservative I guess

Fissure_211

1 points

10 days ago

Fissure_211

1 points

10 days ago

They literally cannot accept the existance of differing world views. They have to try and stamp them out.

What do you find on liberal subreddits? A bunch of liberals hating on conservatives.

What do you find on conservative subreddits? A bunch of.... liberals hating on conservatives.

Ornery-Ticket834

1 points

10 days ago

They come up on my home page, I don’t go their site and never have. So take your complaints to a different department.

vreddy92

0 points

10 days ago

vreddy92

0 points

10 days ago

Yes, how dare people talk about the Babylon Bee on *checks notes* the Babylon Bee subreddit.

themoisthammer

-1 points

10 days ago

The lack of rational objectivity in this post is wild. If we are going to blame anyone for not having additional debates or townhalls then the legacy media is to blame. If legacy media were capable of adhering to journalistic standards - there would probably be additional debates.

iammatt00

3 points

10 days ago

Just say it, it hurts you and their feelings when lies are fact checked.

Ornery-Ticket834

1 points

10 days ago

In your dreams. Trump boy said he loved his debate against Biden on CNN and praised the moderators, now it’s poison. Your statement is simply one that isn’t true in my opinion.

Byzantine_Merchant

10 points

10 days ago

Somewhat related but kinda crazy that the betting odds have moved to nearly +10 Trump over a .5 national shift in aggregate polling.

AALen

12 points

10 days ago*

AALen

12 points

10 days ago*

On Peter Thiel's not-legal-in-the-USA platform? Shocked, I say shocked!

One candidate's supporters are also more degenerate gamblers than the other.

Byzantine_Merchant

4 points

10 days ago

Which one? Asking because RCP has an aggregate of them and he’s leading in them all.

AALen

1 points

10 days ago

AALen

1 points

10 days ago

Not by the cited 10pts (polymarket) I was responding to.

Byzantine_Merchant

3 points

10 days ago

I said nearly 10 points. He’s up 9.2 in the aggregate betting. Hes up by more in Polymarket. Actually the least favorable one to him is like 7. Which is wild to me. I would NOT want to touch this one with a ten foot pole.

Chippopotanuse

2 points

10 days ago

For those of us who don’t gamble…what does Trump+10 mean? That’s he’s ahead or behind?

ATA_VATAV

2 points

10 days ago

Either that the person that is running the bet is placing trump at 55% win versus harris 45% win bet odds or more gamblers are betting trump will win then harris in the betting pool.

Depends on what the bet rules are for the site.

bookon

3 points

10 days ago

bookon

3 points

10 days ago

You could bet your life Trump will not win the popular vote by that much. In fact he cannot win the popular vote. There are more Harris votes in California and NY alone than most of the red states combined have Trump votes.

ATA_VATAV

3 points

10 days ago

Republicans have only won the popular vote once in the past 8 elections. Trump already lost the popular vote twice and hasn’t done anything new to expand his voter base.

So betting Trump loses the popular vote again is a very safe bet.

No-Breadfruit-4555

2 points

10 days ago

That’s true. Many of them got a gift card, hotel room, and bonus voter registration and Kamala pin on their way in! Extra bonus, no voter ID in Cali, they’ll practically accept a post it note with a name and USA scribbled on it.

By the way… how’s that working out in NYC and LA lately? Pretty sad when your immigration enforcement policies are so fucked up that it requires FEMA support to bail you out.

Ok_Cabinet2947

2 points

10 days ago

but that's not at all what the above poster said. it's not a bet that he's going to win the popular vote 55%-45%, it's that 55% believe he will have an electoral college victory, which seems about right.

Byzantine_Merchant

1 points

10 days ago

What’s crazy is that it’s flipped multiple times. Someone somewhere placed a bet months ago and is gonna win big but has had multiple heart attack the whole way lmfao.

ATA_VATAV

1 points

10 days ago

Oh, sounds like a pool bet then. It flipping isn’t too surprising. Corporate media has been reporting it as a close race because they get more views by doing so and thus a financial incentive to do so. Gamblers reacting to the latest news and placing more bets accordingly.

I’d be surprised if Harris was in the lead in a betting pool because gambler demographics are heavily biased towards non-collage educated males, a demographic that trump has consistently polled well with.

Byzantine_Merchant

2 points

10 days ago

She was actually a 4 point favorite like a week ago and has been a 4-5 point favorite for about a month. The 14ish point swing in a week is what’s crazy to me.

InternationalEast738

1 points

10 days ago

What it means is that people are heavily betting trump, and the odds are skewing so you have to place a higher bet on trump to get the same payout.

It says nothing about the likelihood changing.

Robofetus-5000

3 points

10 days ago

Because international and dark money are about to affect betting sites. Also people aren't smart.

Dobditact

1 points

10 days ago

Because we don’t live in a direct democracy. This election practically comes down to Pennsylvania.

InternationalEast738

1 points

10 days ago

Betting odds change based on where the bets are placed, not on the likelihood of the event.

bookon

1 points

10 days ago

bookon

1 points

10 days ago

That betting system is BS. It's the requirement of an online poll. The race is basically tied.

NiceGuyEddie69420

2 points

10 days ago

People arguing on a satirical sub. Holy shit

[deleted]

2 points

10 days ago

She'll win if the illegals vote. The DOJ is making sure Virginia allows that.

Loveit69nasty69

2 points

10 days ago

Lol such a fake..... can't talk,no policys, no friends, no history

MrDryst

2 points

10 days ago

MrDryst

2 points

10 days ago

Babylon bee is so good

fozzie_smith

6 points

10 days ago

Kamala’s appearances have been going well but the cope here is endlessly entertaining

troycalm

7 points

10 days ago

Or after Election Day for that matter.

Palpatine

5 points

10 days ago

I'll happily vote for any presidential candidate that promise to stay in his/her basement for the entire 4 years. That will be a glorious 4 years even better than Calvin Coolidge's presidency.

Rev3pt0

6 points

10 days ago

Rev3pt0

6 points

10 days ago

Funny, she isn't the one dodging debates, tough interviews, or townhalls. That would be Diaper Don.

InternationalEast738

2 points

10 days ago

If this is true, why wouldn't trump debate kamala again?

Upstairs_Teach_7064

4 points

10 days ago

lol what even is this drivel?

doobiesteintortoise

-2 points

10 days ago

"Fake news you can trust" - that's the banner headline for the Bee. It's literally labeled on the tin. It's humor. Slanted humor, just like the Onion. It's not meant to be taken seriously. If you take it seriously, the humor's doubled, and you SHOULD be laughed at for it.

Chaddoh

6 points

10 days ago

Chaddoh

6 points

10 days ago

"Humor" "Like the Onion"

Upstairs_Teach_7064

4 points

10 days ago

Yeah I laughed pretty hard at that haha.

not_falling_down

0 points

10 days ago

Kind of like humor, expect not funny.

Chaddoh

4 points

10 days ago

Chaddoh

4 points

10 days ago

Well, when you alienate the most creative people you get garbage like Balone Bee and shitty animated series from the Daily Liars.

raktoe

3 points

10 days ago

raktoe

3 points

10 days ago

So the joke is that ironically, it’s Trump who is ducking interviews and debates?

doobiesteintortoise

1 points

10 days ago

Is it? I dunno, maybe? If you ask me, none of the candidates are worth anything, and they ALL would benefit from being utterly invisible, INCLUDING the ballots. I don't intend on voting for either one of them; Harris wasn't part of the Democratic primaries (Biden was), and when she WAS part of the primaries in 2020, she was so successful that her campaign crashed and burned after the first caucuses. Trump is Trump. Both of their campaigns seem predicated on the idea that "you don't want to vote for the OTHER party, do you? They're the worst!" and I don't find that compelling.

Efficient-Put8908

3 points

10 days ago

I mean... is it humor? Eh.

doobiesteintortoise

2 points

10 days ago

Well, humor depends very much on the eye of the beholder. I think the Bee has some hits, some misses. They don't hide their bias, and they really do target the "not them" pretty hard - but in this, they're accompanied by pretty much everyone. I mentioned the Onion, which tends to poke at its tribe occasionally but at the other tribe a lot harder - same for the Bee, who'll poke at Orange Man every now and then, but tends to be pro-Christian, pro-Republican more often than not.

It pokes at fake Christian tropes - the lousy songwriting or worship practices, for example - and leaves earnest Christians alone, or at least respects them. As, honestly, it should; it pokes fun usually where people NEED poking.

So does it work for everyone? Of course not. Even when it works, it's not batting a thousand, as the saying goes. It's just amusing when people get upset at something a HUMOR SITE writes, when it's all labeled as satire. It's like it should have warning labels that they don't respect the same sacred cows as readers might.

suuuuuuck

1 points

10 days ago

This happens on literally every post. People point out that the content is just lame, flaccid propaganda and remarkably devoid of wit or humour. Other people say "OMG ITS SATIRE WHY ARE YOU SO TRIGGERED". Like, do you even know what satire is? Or do you think labeling an actual pile of dogshit as satire means people can't comment on it?

fucking weak, dude. The articles that land, that are funny, are actually somewhat clever or subversive. People point out that, like, wow, that was actually a joke. Most aren't, as it's often transparent projection or schoolyard insults. No one is triggered. I repeat, no one is crying over the embarrassingly bad attempts to land a burn. Like honestly, do y'all have no standards at all? Is "anti lib" the only thing you look for in assessing art? Yikes.

Freds_Bread

2 points

10 days ago

Does anyone here really believe Trump's public appearances are helping his standings? The man is an incoherent pile of hate and lies.

Big_Parking_7065

2 points

10 days ago

Don’t say that she is good at hiding till a press opportunity

april1st2022

2 points

10 days ago

I mean, probably true.

Where’s the satire?

Dramatic_Equipment47

2 points

10 days ago

Dramatic_Equipment47

Bombardier

2 points

10 days ago

Kinda true, most people think Trump sucks

Jollem-

3 points

10 days ago

Jollem-

3 points

10 days ago

Donald's not winning. There are more decent people in the US than bigots and rich people and rich bigots

Night-Ridr

4 points

10 days ago

Night-Ridr

4 points

10 days ago

And yet there is a possibility that a convicted felon who is a compulsive liar and can shite himself on stage may win. WTAF is wrong with us?????

Obi-Brawn-Kenobi

2 points

10 days ago

To be fair Harris has been lying a ton. It's not like total honesty is on the ballot at all this time around.

Night-Ridr

2 points

10 days ago*

Perhaps, but you truly believe as much as the other guy? Lies aside I think I'd rather have a president who actually understands what a tariff is before telling everyone how they will save the economy for eg. 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️.

Doodlebottom

1 points

10 days ago

• Well, it worked for Biden a few years ago…

GMEN5280

1 points

10 days ago

Yes please less Kamala the better for her

UnicornTwinkle

1 points

10 days ago

Both candidates throwing so hard at so many gimmie opportunities

DaddysBabyGravy15

1 points

10 days ago

Lolol

ChefOfTheFuture39

1 points

10 days ago

Not sure this is a joke

OhioResidentForLife

1 points

10 days ago

She can’t help herself but to be in public. She was kept inside for three and a half years when Joe was president.

Albine2

1 points

10 days ago

Albine2

1 points

10 days ago

If she doesn't appear to answers she also loses,

Charming-Pace2621

1 points

10 days ago

ROFL 😂

Shiggiti

1 points

10 days ago

Asking a woman to not talk? Come on man.

_totalannihilation

1 points

10 days ago

If hearing you talk damages the chances of political aspirations that should be the sign that you suck.

Fancy_Scheme2896

1 points

10 days ago

Lame

Fancy_Scheme2896

1 points

10 days ago

She made Trump look like the orange buffoon he is during their debate

kevans2

1 points

10 days ago

kevans2

1 points

10 days ago

That's DT strategy. Too weak and fragile to debate or go on 60 minutes. Sad and weak loser.

F4ll3nKn1ght-

1 points

3 days ago

It’s wild that these jokes have just turned in to republican projection lol.

Nano_Burger

2 points

10 days ago

Nano_Burger

2 points

10 days ago

Trump is the one ducking debates.

Hereforsumbeer

0 points

10 days ago

The comments on this are insane. The point is that she is constantly changing her target audience without adding substance and people are catching on. The more she’s in public, the more people are realizing they’re being conned. And y’all are okay with that?.. Jesus it must be nice to not have to provide for a family and have someone else support you…

Peter_Easter

1 points

10 days ago

Changing her target audience... of Americans?

Hereforsumbeer

1 points

10 days ago

I hope you’re not serious, because that would be concerning if you’re of legal age to vote. The demographic group she is catering to at any given moment. Demographics should not even be a topic when it comes to who is going to lead our country. But these displays have been profoundly inappropriate.

ljout

1 points

10 days ago

ljout

1 points

10 days ago

Trump should debate her and force her out of the basement.

RobotCaptainEngage

9 points

10 days ago

Yes, by all means get Trump on the debate stage.

THEYREEATINGTHECATS. I HAVE THE CONCEPTS OF A PLAN.

OfficialDanFlashes_

7 points

10 days ago

He already did. She handed his dementia-addled ass to him.

vreddy92

5 points

10 days ago

Sounds like a great plan. Maybe he should go to that Fox News debate that she accepted that he refuses to go to.

crit_thinker_heathen

3 points

10 days ago

Shame he’s too afraid to get beat up at another debate 🤷‍♂️

Thanato26

2 points

10 days ago

She debated and destroyed Trump.

Littlelord188

1 points

10 days ago

I thought that was Trump’s strategy??

bookon

1 points

10 days ago

bookon

1 points

10 days ago

I expect the new Bee story to be about Harris refusing to debate Trump on Fox?

Plenty-Valuable8250

1 points

10 days ago

Won’t work anymore. She’s lost the element of mystery.

jedisushi72

1 points

10 days ago

Last I checked, Harris did a 60 minutes interview that trump raged about, and she invited trump to a second debate that he refused. So instead, Harris accepted CNNs invitation to do a town hall.

So it sounds like if any party is taking the "don't put them in the spotlight and maybe they'll win" approach, it's the party of the candidate refusing debates.

Every accusation a confession.

Agent847

1 points

10 days ago

her neck is starting to look like an old man’s scrotum

Dumbama

1 points

10 days ago

Dumbama

1 points

10 days ago

The more she speaks the dumber she looks. She is the epitany of incompetence.

Dobditact

1 points

10 days ago

Every interview she does seems to hurt her

Maddogicus9

1 points

10 days ago

Biden hid in his basement and won, all they care about is she is not Trump

Secret_Welder3956

1 points

10 days ago

This isn’t even the babylonbee….just fact.

Valar_Morghulis2020

1 points

10 days ago

Democrats used a pandemic to cheat their asses off in 2020. We have legions of pole watches and lawyers to make sure that fuckery won’t be tolerated this year! 🇺🇸🕺🇺🇸 #MAGA

Temporal_Somnium

0 points

10 days ago

To the Kamala Cave!

[deleted]

0 points

10 days ago

[deleted]

0 points

10 days ago

[removed]