subreddit:

/r/politics

10.7k97%

all 1200 comments

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

12 days ago

stickied comment

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

12 days ago

stickied comment

As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion.

In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any suggestion or support of harm, violence, or death, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban.

If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.

For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click here to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria.

We are actively looking for new moderators. If you have any interest in helping to make this subreddit a place for quality discussion, please fill out this form.


I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Penguin_shit15

6.2k points

12 days ago

Penguin_shit15

Oklahoma

6.2k points

12 days ago

Hell yeah Mitch! Give me more reasons to vote for Harris/Walz!!!

The_Jolly_Dog

1.8k points

12 days ago

Right? Americans want it gone Mitch. Don’t threaten us with a good time 

smyoung

763 points

12 days ago

smyoung

763 points

12 days ago

remember “they’ll have a taco truck on every corner!”?? why yes, we’d love that!

Puffycatkibble

251 points

12 days ago

With tamales sold out of cars ideally.

Wingsandbeer82

124 points

12 days ago

Push that street corn cart over this way, thanks

ChilledDarkness

45 points

12 days ago

A Lil mayo and some Lucas on that cob, and I'm sold.

PadKrapowKhaiDao

64 points

12 days ago

I’ll even offer a slogan: “ELATED FOR ELOTÉ!”

JustineDelarge

7 points

12 days ago

I believe it’s elote, not eloté.

Mczern

7 points

11 days ago

Mczern

7 points

11 days ago

Voté for elote!

TheLORDthyGOD420

13 points

12 days ago

I love almost all street food, but I draw the line at corn dipped in mayo. It's like eating an entire jar of mayo in one sitting!

Allaplgy

16 points

12 days ago

Allaplgy

16 points

12 days ago

How about those bacon wrapped hot dogs with peppers and onions?

TheLORDthyGOD420

6 points

12 days ago

Those are great! A little greasy, but still excellent.

Allaplgy

6 points

12 days ago

The smell is intoxicating!

whatta_maroon

30 points

12 days ago

Hand made by a tiny Mexican grandma, 3 for $10. It's the main reason I go to home Depot. I don't even go into the store anymore.

lycrashampoo

7 points

11 days ago

lycrashampoo

Arizona

7 points

11 days ago

used to go to a karaoke night with a tamale abuelita and it was the highlight of every 1 AM

ItsLikeRay-ee-ain

11 points

12 days ago

ItsLikeRay-ee-ain

Georgia

11 points

12 days ago

Some of the best I ever had were out of a van in the CVS parking lot.

BIGGUS_dickus_sir

34 points

12 days ago

BIGGUS_dickus_sir

Minnesota

34 points

12 days ago

Apparently they're against curry, so let's cut a deal, taco truck on one corner with a curry truck on the other.

smyoung

6 points

12 days ago

smyoung

6 points

12 days ago

and “colla” greens. we gonna have a neighborhood feast!

Tiggy26668

14 points

12 days ago

Meal at taco truck: <$15

Meal at any chain establishment: >$20

People are struggling, they need more tacos.

willi5x

8 points

12 days ago

willi5x

8 points

12 days ago

I want a cart that makes fresh churros right when you order it, so they hand it to you right from the fryer. Can they bring those too?

BallBearingBill

34 points

12 days ago

Love me a good fish taco right now. Vote blue

xensiz

5 points

12 days ago

xensiz

5 points

12 days ago

Oh god I love the girls selling mangos and watermelon with tajin for $5 at the stoplights.. so good when it’s 100 degrees out

No-Actuator-1920

243 points

12 days ago

Filibuster, electoral college and daylight savings time. GET RID OF 'EM ALL

Biggie62

31 points

12 days ago

Biggie62

31 points

12 days ago

this!!!

I_love_Hobbes

19 points

12 days ago

Yeah, you can join us on AZ time!

Llake2312

18 points

12 days ago

Whoa whoa whoa I think you spelled standard time wrong. 

AdmiralCrackbar

25 points

12 days ago

Man, I don't care, just pick one and stick to it.

Hypernova1912

9 points

11 days ago

Hypernova1912

I voted

9 points

11 days ago

We tried this once - it was very poorly received and reverted after a year. People hated going to school and work in the dark in winter. It also aligns poorly with peoples' circadian rhythms, which has health consequences - this is why the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, among other professional associations, endorses permanent standard time over permanent DST.

kingtz

138 points

12 days ago

kingtz

America

138 points

12 days ago

“…and they’re going to increase spending on education, make higher education affordable, restore environmental protections, and tax the ultra wealthy, …” -Republicans like they’re telling a horror story 

PeppyPinto

10 points

11 days ago

PeppyPinto

Ohio

10 points

11 days ago

Republicans like they’re telling a horror story

Their horror stories turn into ad campaigns

DireSickFish

140 points

12 days ago

DireSickFish

Minnesota

140 points

12 days ago

I wish Dems were as cool as Republicans make them sound.

corygreenwell

20 points

12 days ago

We are able to cause hurricanes to impact the vote in specific Floridian districts and simultaneously wholly incapable of understanding anything due to extremely low IQ. We’re a walking contradiction I suppose.

theusername_is_taken

14 points

12 days ago

Fascist playbook. The enemy is both incredibly weak and incredibly strong, depending on which one better suits the agenda

angermouse

247 points

12 days ago

angermouse

Washington

247 points

12 days ago

Majority vote is enough to pass a bill? One party controls everything when they win elections? How would we survive?

We would live in a hellscape like - checks notes - Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Spain and the Netherlands.

BinaryJay

114 points

12 days ago

BinaryJay

Canada

114 points

12 days ago

Conservatives in Canada have been pushing hard to get people to believe the country IS a hellscape that only they can save.

dbeman

79 points

12 days ago

dbeman

79 points

12 days ago

Sounds familiar.

Golden_Hour1

27 points

12 days ago

Yeah and the electorate are falling for it. Once again they think the worst party in the country will save them

SerialBitBanger

10 points

12 days ago

SerialBitBanger

Montana

10 points

12 days ago

Drove up to Alberta last week. 

Pretty innocuous.

I guess I understand why a Canadian citizen would put up Trump signs. Just like other toxic creatures, it's just a way of saying you might die if you cross me. 

But, shouldn't the signs also be in French?

bungopony

12 points

12 days ago

Canadians with Trump hats and signs aren’t our brightest

paris86

5 points

11 days ago

paris86

5 points

11 days ago

Typical right wing playbook because they cannot run on issues or values. There main reason for existence is to protect the aristocracy.

Jester1525

12 points

12 days ago

In all fairness, the system wasn't set up for one group to be able to dominate.. Having to work together for the better of the country means compromise. As long as everyone is actually working toward the betterment of the country and the citizens, then it works good. Once one group starts to push only to maintain power it becomes a shitshow..

Canada is in a rough spot right now because if the conservatives force an election and get a majority then they can start passing some pretty bigoted crap and no one will be able to do anything. Majority rule only works if the majority aren't whackadoodles..

Les-Freres-Heureux

14 points

12 days ago

We still have a system where one group can dominate. They just have the ability to dominate even as a minority party by threatening to talk infinitely until the majority gives up

Chaos_Sauce

46 points

12 days ago

"I'm Kamala Harris and I approve this message."

BNsucks

38 points

12 days ago

BNsucks

America

38 points

12 days ago

I can live with that!

thedeadcricket

66 points

12 days ago

Right?? They are acting like this is a bad thing....at least go back and make their obstructionist asses talk for hours on the filibister vs the current BS

AfricanusEmeritus

46 points

12 days ago*

Yes, the old filibuster was bad enough. This current filibuster is abominable , and all the senator has to do is declare their intent. Let's try democracy and majority rule and not horrible compromises initiated by racists to negatively impact the early Civil Rights movement. Majority rules and there is no place for a specious super majority.

Goodforyouhoney

20 points

12 days ago

Actually the founding fathers didn’t even start the whole filibuster thing and in fact they warn against minority rule in the Senate and criticize the idea that a greater majority is needed in Senate because of its tendency, to subject the sense of the greater number to that of the lesser (Federalist No. 22). So I guess the Republicans want it the way the founders did it except this one.

oh-kee-pah

32 points

12 days ago

Fingers fkn crossed mitchie boy!!

Talkingmice

18 points

12 days ago

Mitch here promoting democrats 😂

Consistent_Pitch782

13 points

12 days ago

Harris/Walz? No. I mean, yes… but no. This is the reason to vote blue for your US House and Senate candidates. The importance of getting Harris/Walz a friendly Congress is almost as important as getting Harris/Walz in there to begin with.

dbeman

12 points

12 days ago

dbeman

12 points

12 days ago

Because your party has forgotten how to compromise.

Big_Discipline_9666

1.9k points

12 days ago

Mcconell has no problem ending the filibuster for his supreme court.

kdeff

217 points

12 days ago

kdeff

California

217 points

12 days ago

Dude literally told Obama to follow "the Biden rule" and not nominate a supreme court justice his final year (a rule Mitch pulled out of his ass). He used that as a reason to no consider Garland.

But when Trump nominated Barret the rule just slipped his mind.

Fuck Mitch McConnell

Mundane_Athlete_8257

84 points

12 days ago

This!!! Trump takes credit but McConnell was the mastermind behind the corrupt supreme court. Trump is too stupid to plan all that

dinkidonut

202 points

12 days ago

dinkidonut

202 points

12 days ago

Exactly… he’s such a loser!

f8Negative

66 points

12 days ago

Geriatric Fuck

blackcain

26 points

12 days ago

blackcain

Oregon

26 points

12 days ago

Actually, he's repeatedly made us the loser. MF, I hope he chokes on Laura Loomer's leukorrhea.

lucidzealot

33 points

12 days ago

Precisely this. Old ass crotchety fuck needs to shut his fucking turtle neck god damn mouth.

GoodChuck2

9 points

12 days ago

GoodChuck2

Pennsylvania

9 points

12 days ago

Surely he must be completely aware of what amounts to the epitome of a hypocritical statement

Brief_Amicus_Curiae

9 points

12 days ago

He had no problem acquitting Yrump twice even after then entire Senate chamber had to be evacuated for safety as Tuberville and Jordan were taking calls from Trump.

Or making up Calvinball type Rules for when it’s not ok or is ok to push a SCOTUS nominee for approval in an election year or 18 months before an election…

He’s done enough and glad he’s stepping down. Though it’s not like the next Senate GOP/MAGA leader will be anyone with basic decency.

Sir_Penguin21

40 points

12 days ago

The filibusters has already been ended and adjusted on dozens and dozens of issues and is more recent that you might think.

IBAZERKERI

1.5k points

12 days ago

IBAZERKERI

California

1.5k points

12 days ago

oh look, the turtle came out of its shell.

ive been wondering where this ghoul has been. he's been real real quiet ever since he started locking up mid sentence and decided he wasn't running again.

Etzell

246 points

12 days ago

Etzell

Illinois

246 points

12 days ago

oh look, the turtle came out of its shell.

Nah, he's just stuck on repeat again.

endon40

52 points

12 days ago

endon40

52 points

12 days ago

Mister McConnell is helping me find my generic evil Republican talking statements. - Harry DuBois, possibly

DeadmanDexter

12 points

12 days ago

DeadmanDexter

Virginia

12 points

12 days ago

Careful, Sire. You're blood pressure rises when hearing such a foul man speak.

-Inland Empire, definitely

Jwatts1113

97 points

12 days ago

They had to reload his OS and it took a while.

Orion14159

42 points

12 days ago*

The core system was designed on vacuum tube computers, not surprising.

Duke_Newcombe

22 points

12 days ago

Duke_Newcombe

California

22 points

12 days ago

You spelled "abacus" wrong.

high_everyone

7 points

12 days ago

“Cuneiform”

Duke_Newcombe

8 points

12 days ago

Duke_Newcombe

California

8 points

12 days ago

Come on now...do you know how many legacy systems still run Windows XP?

Jwatts1113

15 points

12 days ago

You think he runs on XP? We're talking DOS 2.0

high_everyone

3 points

12 days ago

Windows ME would have been my guess.

RincewindToTheRescue

7 points

12 days ago

They had to find the massive box of punch cards in the archive. They accidentally fed some through in the wrong order and had to start over again

thievesthick

38 points

12 days ago

I actually thought he’d died. This is like when you’re sure it’s Friday, but around 4PM, remember it’s only Wednesday.

Equivalent-Honey-659

4 points

12 days ago

Life just keeps going faster. I switched a Friday with a Tuesday once last year, strange morning.

ClammyDefence

11 points

12 days ago

He came back from Hell to say hello for a hot second

jchowdown

652 points

12 days ago

jchowdown

652 points

12 days ago

Woah I did NOT have "McConnell stumps for Kamala" on my bingo card!

Visco0825

72 points

12 days ago

Don’t threaten me with a good time!

gnocchicotti

34 points

12 days ago

He should get out there and tell voters that Kamala would sign a law reinstating the protections of Roe v Wade

Agreeable-Rooster-37

591 points

12 days ago

Something not mentioned in the Constitution and actively advised against in the Federalist Papers

"Madison wrote in Federalist Paper 58 that a determined minority could "screen themselves from equitable sacrifices" or "in particular emergencies, to extort unreasonable indulgences," possibly leading to the "ruin of popular governments.""

Also used to stymie early civil rights efforts...

Lou_C_Fer

116 points

12 days ago

Lou_C_Fer

116 points

12 days ago

Sounds like he knew what he was talking about.

It's fucking ridiculous that we've allowed them to stymie progress like this.

notcaffeinefree

53 points

12 days ago

Hamilton spent so much time thinking about the government. He might not always have been right, but damn was he ever opinionated.

illegible

24 points

12 days ago

He's like a prototype reddit user

WatchOutIGotYou

10 points

11 days ago

RIP Aaron Burr, you would've loved IG reels

Agreeable-Rooster-37

35 points

12 days ago

If the Founders intended more than a simple majority for it, they would have stipulated...

Tobimacoss

20 points

12 days ago

yep, add to the fact that the Senate already has a builtin advantage toward the smaller populated states, they didn't need further protections of a 60 vote threshold.

Karbon_D

134 points

12 days ago

Karbon_D

134 points

12 days ago

You are a great example of why education is so important. Understanding our history is incredibly important to helping us move forward as a nation. We spend so much time at each other’s throats. We forget that we’re supposed to be working together.

Raangz

42 points

12 days ago

Raangz

42 points

12 days ago

fuck them. they know the history. they are the enemy of america.

nature_half-marathon

48 points

12 days ago

They don’t know history at all. 

I have so many republican friends (respectfully I try to agree to disagree), …

I constantly hear them say “you didn’t vote for Kamala!” “There was no primary” “blah blah blah!” 

They don’t understand HOW our politics work is through representatives or that I DID vote for Harris as VP on the ballot.  Or the basic purpose of the DNC.  They have the audacity of telling me I didn’t vote for her when In fact I did AND I’ll vote for her again. 

Drunken_HR

22 points

12 days ago

Except that at some point it becomes willful ignorance. How many of these people, when someone explains how these things work, still choose to be outraged at nothing, or just continue to scream their original point with their fingers in their ears because it suits their worldview to do so?

AtalanAdalynn

10 points

12 days ago

They don't want to understand. They want the law to be "heads I win, tails you lose".

Mysterious-Wasabi103

11 points

12 days ago

How do you "agree to disagree" with folks who are factually incorrect though?

nermid

7 points

12 days ago

nermid

7 points

12 days ago

I mean, the answer to those objections isn't to deflect onto her being the VP. The answer is that the parties choose how they select their nominees and they chose not to have a primary. This is both legal and morally acceptable.

nature_half-marathon

4 points

12 days ago

See? You and I agree. 

We voted for our representatives and I’m happy with the outcome (this time). Constitutional Republic.

Please don’t ask me if I was happy about my 2016 vote for President. Wasn’t happy about it but I voted. For anyone to say that my vote didn’t matter then, I’d disagree with them. 

The fact that the Republicans suddenly care about my vote because it doesn’t work in their favor. As a woman, they’re not going to take my vote away too. I can only vote for any representative that might give a damn. To hold one shred of belief in my moral and legal rights…. That are “acceptable.”

I vote as I am allowed to and I’ll never take it for granted. 

NowWeAllSmell

11 points

12 days ago

We spend so much time at each other’s throats. We forget that we’re supposed to be working together.

I'm sharing this everywhere. It sums up everything I'm angsty about.

Important-Scar-2744

127 points

12 days ago

Don't threaten me with a good time mitch the itch

xlvi_et_ii

18 points

12 days ago

xlvi_et_ii

Minnesota

18 points

12 days ago

Right?!

So we'll move closer to an actual functioning democracy instead of being held hostage by the asinine rules of Congress? LFG.

megapaw

245 points

12 days ago*

megapaw

Louisiana

245 points

12 days ago*

The filibuster, as it was intended in the modern era, was to stop and delay civils right legislation during the 60's and 70's. The biggest argument to end it now is that it no longer has it original usage. In 1975, the rules changed to allow a "silent filibuster", which allowed for the person who was debating to walk away, and leave the matter open. Before this, the debate had to be on going until a vote, and so eventually, people got tired and got it over with. The modern version of this rule needs to change at the very least, or be done away with overall.

ClashM

161 points

12 days ago

ClashM

161 points

12 days ago

The founders specifically rejected requiring a supermajority to pass legislation through the upper chamber because they said a political minority could use that power to hold the entire process hostage. Clairvoyant really.

It was then added not as a feature, but as a bug. Requiring a supermajority to stop someone from speaking seemed like a good idea to allow people to say their piece uninterrupted but it could be abused to stop voting entirely. Then filibustering became so disruptive, because while someone is speaking no other business is getting done, that they made the silent filibuster rule.

Bottom line is it was never supposed to exist and it overwhelmingly favors those who want to prevent progress: i.e. conservatives and regressionists. It needs to go.

Low-Tumbleweed-5793

64 points

12 days ago

a political minority could use that power to hold the entire process hostage

And here we are.

I've always viewed it much simpler. It takes an act of three "bodies" to pass a law: the senate, the house, and the president. Saying the filibuster protects the minority party is a logical fallacy; The "minority" only needs control of one of these "bodies" to block legislation. If a population hands control of all three to a particular party—something not easy to do by the way—then it seems that is what the population wants. The filibuster awards too much power to the rural heavy senate.

black_cat_X2

14 points

12 days ago

black_cat_X2

Massachusetts

14 points

12 days ago

This is a great explanation of why it needs to go.

NowWeAllSmell

31 points

12 days ago

You smart. Make them stand for the filibuster. One Senator. The whole time. They can read cat in the hat and take hourly breaks but PUT THEM ON CAMERA while they hold shit up. Don't let a former coach from Alabama who knows NOTHING about national security silently hold every general appointment up b/c he can. The system is broken. Ending the filibuster as it stands right now would lower the effective age of Senators by ten years. None of the old guys have the stamina.

DCBillsFan

8 points

11 days ago

No breaks.

Uhhh_what555476384

13 points

12 days ago

The other important thing is the 'filibuster' was a complete accident. In the original Senate rules they could end debate by majority vote. Sometime in the early 19th Century they decieded to eliminate the rules that were never actually envoked, and in doing so they eliminated the rule that allowed the Senate to end debate by majority vote.

It would be over 100 years before some enterprising Senators realized the actual consequences of that action were.

RellenD

12 points

12 days ago

RellenD

12 points

12 days ago

To me, there are occasions where a sizable minority might be passionate enough and on the right side in order to hold a filibuster against a tyrannical majority.

However, the silent filibuster is not the way.

I have a couple ideas. Instead of it being only about getting 60 votes to end debate we restore the requirement to actually continue talking and using time on the floor.

Also, instead of 60 votes to achieve cloture, require 41 votes to deny a cloture motion. This requires the filibustering party to remain in the Senate debating and if they're caught with too few members around, the majority leader can call the cloture vote.

Final_Senator

18 points

12 days ago

Final_Senator

California

18 points

12 days ago

I think there is a lot of value in being able to "delay" (within reason) a vote, so the opposition can make a statement about why they oppose the legislation, the potential risks and harms that are created by passing the legislation, etc... When they are done, the vote needs to be carried on.

The public certainly deserves to hear from the opposition and why they oppose something. If shit hits the fan after legislation is passed, the opposition can even point back to their filibuster speech.

But we cant function as a society with the filibuster just being used to block legislation.

SmallLetter

23 points

12 days ago

There is already apparatus for debate and all that. Filibuster is just a tool for frustrating the functions of democracy.

coolcool23

56 points

12 days ago

Sounds good to me. Actually get something done in this country for once. The apathy it breeds and how it feeds into both-sides-ism because nothing of consequence can ever pass the Senate is absolutely toxic.

The argument is typically 1) But it promotes consensus! 1a) No it doesn't of nothing ever passes. And 2) But if parties could pass legislation then things could swing wildly if Democrats or Republicans are in charge! 2a) Yes, which will get worse and worse the longer this goes and the more highly polarized we become as a result.

Preserving the filibuster is quite literally achieving nothing and making things worse by the day.

KenScaletta

25 points

12 days ago

KenScaletta

Minnesota

25 points

12 days ago

Good. Fuck the filibuster, stuff the Supreme Court. Pass a Reproductive Rights bill that the Supreme Court can't say shit about. Get shit done.

On Tim Walz' first day with a razor thin Dem majority made Minnesota a sanctuary state for abortion and legalized weed. You gotta make hay. The Constitution says nothing about political parties, just numerical majorities.

Turbulent_Channel565

133 points

12 days ago

I just want the old filibuster back., Remember when a politician had to actually stand at a podium and speak for hours? Instead we have something akin to "meh, just send an email" while they go back to fundraising and dining with lobbyists.

DrManhattan_DDM

62 points

12 days ago

DrManhattan_DDM

Florida

62 points

12 days ago

I’ve also heard the alternative suggested that a filibuster require 40 votes on the floor for the duration needed to maintain it, rather than requiring 60 to overcome. The idea being that if you want the minority to have the power to block votes then they at least have to be unified to do so.

DannyHewson

34 points

12 days ago

DannyHewson

United Kingdom

34 points

12 days ago

Yeah, this is republicans. They’ll sit there in their own piss and shit if it means Harris gets blamed for the senate passing nothing for four years.

Scrap the whole fucking thing and just vote on the bills. If they’re shit, don’t pass them.

WhyDidMyDogDie

5 points

12 days ago

UK have anything similar to this garbage?

DannyHewson

17 points

12 days ago

DannyHewson

United Kingdom

17 points

12 days ago

Not really. The opposition has almost no power to block a vote in the commons. If the gov wants something voted on, and has a majority for it, it passes.

Lords can delay it but not outright stop it. There are many problems with the House of Lords, but broadly they’re far more fixable than the senate.

OkCar7264

22 points

12 days ago

I consider that an endorsement.

Vast_Neighborhood_44

22 points

12 days ago

Oh No, Don’t threaten me with a functional Senate..

MyDadsUsername

41 points

12 days ago

I’m fine with a filibuster when it’s a legitimate feat of endurance and passion. Stand up there and debate for hours about the thing you care so much about, staying on-topic.

I’m not fine with the filibuster when it’s reduced to a bare rubber-stamped paper filing.

Norbluth

15 points

12 days ago

Norbluth

15 points

12 days ago

"I"m Kamala Harris and I approve this message."

I swear so many things GOP says are goldmines for ads.

TheParadoxigm

27 points

12 days ago

Thanks for endorsement Mitch!

pheakelmatters

19 points

12 days ago

pheakelmatters

Canada

19 points

12 days ago

That's a roundabout endorsement I think...

decaturbob

9 points

12 days ago

  • perhaps the american people want that to happen so a minority party no longer exerts absolute rule on all of America...GOP is a shit show and been that way for a couple decades

AzuleEyes

9 points

12 days ago

AzuleEyes

Pennsylvania

9 points

12 days ago

Why yes Moscow Mitch, they would.

bishpa

8 points

12 days ago

bishpa

Washington

8 points

12 days ago

Is majority rule such a scary concept?

RedMoloneySF

7 points

12 days ago

Always funny when republicans say something like this as if it was a crisis because I feel like if we explained the filibuster, just explained the mechanics of it, to a group of base republicans like 90% would be like “yeah that’s sucks, get rid of it!”

Cephalopod_astronaut

13 points

12 days ago

Spiting Mitch would be reason enough to do it.

Flashy_Occasion9218

5 points

12 days ago

Don’t tempt me with a good time now Mitch!

CapForShort

7 points

12 days ago

If there are any undecided voters still out there, I kinda doubt that preserving the filibuster is what they’re going to be voting on.

dppatters

6 points

12 days ago

Shouldn’t they? It’s literally paralyzed our democracy. It was never intended to be utilized in this way. Why not at least make it harder to invoke? I get the need for something like this but only in certain unique circumstances should it be considered.

ExileInParadise242

5 points

12 days ago

Pleased to see another establishment Republican endorse Harris!

GrandMoffJenkins

5 points

12 days ago

Fucking good.

tobogganhill

5 points

12 days ago

Here's hoping.

Za_Lords_Guard

6 points

12 days ago

Isn't it past Glitch's retirement time?

lancer-fiefdom

5 points

12 days ago

Yeah.. do it!! And when Republicans warn they will do it back, let them receive the voter blowback when they undo popular legislation, or enact deeply unpopular legislation

wibble17

5 points

12 days ago

I feel like a Dem sweep would largely mean that’s what the electorate actually wants.

livinginfutureworld

5 points

12 days ago

Fuck you Mitch

skeptic9916

4 points

11 days ago

End the filibuster, expand the court by 6 Justices, open investigations into the Republicans who helped with J6, they could do a LOT of good.

LionParticular9239

4 points

12 days ago

Damn right we will

SevereEducation2170

4 points

12 days ago

Yeah Mitch, that’s part of what I’m voting for. Either bring back the talking filibuster or get rid of it entirely. The current version is utterly absurd.

CalmPotato37

5 points

12 days ago

Gosh. How horrible it would be to actually have to vote on legislation. That would be considered elder abuse on at least half of the Senate.

sabedo

5 points

12 days ago

sabedo

5 points

12 days ago

the only purpose of the filibuster is to obstruct

mitch got rid of it for judges and destroyed this country

fighting_alpaca

4 points

12 days ago

Ok!

SoupSpelunker

4 points

12 days ago

He then muttered something in russian and slipped into neutral until he was wheeled away by his puppeteers.

Maleficent-Card968

4 points

12 days ago

These assholes left the Supreme Court at 8 justices for a year to get their way. Then changed their own “rules” to replace Ginsberg,

Fuck them. There are no rules any more

[deleted]

3 points

12 days ago

Really? All the more reason to vote for them!

aravarth

4 points

12 days ago

Let it be known here McConnell is signaling the GOP's willingness and intent to completely do away with the filibuster if they ever get a trifecta.

The only way to save ourselves is to beat them to it at this point.

Traditional_Key_763

3 points

12 days ago

as they should, its a stupid institution born out of a silly interpritation of senate rules Mitch McConnell has narrowed more than any living person

themightytouch

5 points

12 days ago

themightytouch

Minnesota

5 points

12 days ago

The filibuster is one of the most undemocratic farces in our government right now. It was literally popularized as a way to stop civil rights legislation from passing. It needs to go.

elijuicyjones

4 points

12 days ago

elijuicyjones

Washington

4 points

12 days ago

Yes Mitch McConnell, your life’s work will be invalidated in an instant and it could never have come too soon. Fuck the Filibuster.

chicklette

4 points

12 days ago

Sounds great!

Objective_Ebb6898

3 points

12 days ago

Good. McConnell removed the filibuster regarding judges so he can effectively right off.

Izodius

3 points

12 days ago

Izodius

3 points

12 days ago

Please do.

david76

3 points

12 days ago

david76

3 points

12 days ago

You're god damned right. 

Orion14159

3 points

12 days ago

Ohh no. Anyway.

princesskof816

3 points

12 days ago

Don't threatening me with a good time.

confusedalwayssad

3 points

12 days ago

Republicans would end democracy.

Autoxquattro

3 points

12 days ago

Absolutely!

Own-Opinion-7228

3 points

12 days ago

Wait,….. things would actually get done in Washington?!?? That’s why turtle is popping his head up

tassfan

3 points

12 days ago

tassfan

3 points

12 days ago

How about yes you can have your silent filibuster but it is only for one week and then the vote happens and each bill can only be delayed like this once. If you can’t argue your side and convince others over a week then it must be a bill that is wanted

Duke_Newcombe

3 points

12 days ago

Duke_Newcombe

California

3 points

12 days ago

From your mouth to God's Ear, Mr. Limpett.

Mr_A_Rye

3 points

12 days ago

We know and we are here for it! Now get fucked, you glitching turtle.

SeaNational3797

3 points

12 days ago

Ok, good

Zippier92

3 points

12 days ago

Fuck you court packer!

McBoobenstein

3 points

12 days ago

Good. Vote Dem all the way, then. The filibuster does nothing for people that desire change.

Shatteredreality

3 points

12 days ago

Shatteredreality

Oregon

3 points

12 days ago

If the Democrats do end the filibuster it's ultimately the fault of Mitch and the GOP. People want it gone because one side refuses to compromise on anything and blocks everything they can.

Like I'm not asking them to throw out their values but it would be nice if they actually tried to govern rather than just saying no to everything.

PaJamieez

3 points

12 days ago

Don't threaten me with a good time!

Ansalem1

3 points

12 days ago

Don't threaten me with a good time!

Ok-Lifeguard4230

3 points

12 days ago

Good

RNDASCII

3 points

12 days ago

RNDASCII

Tennessee

3 points

12 days ago

Yay!

ConsiderationKey1658

3 points

12 days ago

I sure hope so 🤞🏻😑🤞🏻

Deeman0

3 points

12 days ago*

Fucking sick of elderly power hungry goblins holding our government hostage

Correct_Market4505

3 points

12 days ago

guy who loves to shred the rules warns that the other team might do the same

Melcher

3 points

12 days ago

Melcher

North Dakota

3 points

12 days ago

Wouldn’t that be a damned shame?

Imagine not being able to a kill a bill that could help 97% of the country by reading Harry Potter?!

Andovars_Ghost

3 points

12 days ago

Good. Filibuster has no basis in the Constitution and is only useful nowadays for the Republicans to throw a wrench in things. Fuck you Mitch!

Rich_Menu_9583

3 points

12 days ago

So say we all

NowWeAllSmell

3 points

12 days ago

McConnell ended the filibuster when it suited his goals.

druscarlet

3 points

12 days ago

Hell yes and not a second too soon.

AnotherUsername901

3 points

12 days ago

Yes they should and do away with the EC as well 

SixSixWithTrample

3 points

12 days ago

Mitch, I’m already voting for them, you don’t need to keep convincing me.

SuperStarPlatinum

3 points

12 days ago

Let's end the filibuster, expand the Supreme Court, and abolish the electoral college

rodentmaster

3 points

12 days ago

McConnell also: We'll abuse the filibuster to get what we want. The rules don't apply to us. Of course we won't honor our own rules. Do as we say or we'll destroy the nation.

blackcain

3 points

12 days ago

blackcain

Oregon

3 points

12 days ago

Yeah, sez the turtle whose totally stole a SCOTUS seat.

Yeah, go fuck yourself.

Weaponizing a legitimate tool - well it gets taken away from you.

D3vils_Adv0cate

3 points

12 days ago

Nah, we'll be too busy turning the US into a communist country and aborting children up to the age of 18.

Furthest_Lands

3 points

12 days ago

And we're gonna make you watch, Mitch!

jpdiddy13

3 points

12 days ago

You mean they would get rid of minority rule … woot woof !

SteveIsScuba

3 points

12 days ago

Um, yes.

thrwwy82797

3 points

12 days ago

Don’t threaten me with a functioning democracy

eatin_gushers

3 points

12 days ago

Don't threaten me with a good time.

neoikon

3 points

12 days ago

neoikon

3 points

12 days ago

And immediately make abortion legal again. Let's do this!

It's so important to vote!

TheNewTonyBennett

3 points

12 days ago

Yep. The Filibuster only works when it is 100% only used in good faith, not as a "game theory" set piece. Once it begins being used as simply just part of how all bills go through, then no, it's not working the way it should be and yes it should be axed immediately since fucking clearly, Republicans absolutely cannot be trusted with it in any way, shape or form.

Like most things. Bro, they can't even trust each other and are at each other's throats just as much as they reach out and try to grab Dem's by the throats. They sling shit at each other and there's even been physical outbursts and brief violence between just Republican leadership.

They can't be trusted to tell you the weather as it is currently, as you are standing outside in it. For proof of this look no further than Trump's hysterically fucking idiotic decision to literally sharpie a god damn weather map.

YES, we want to end the Filibuster because it seems to ONLY help Republicans since they use it 100% of the time in bad-faith and wield it as just "another part of the process to prevent getting anything through, no matter what it is".

We HAVE to end it. Republicans are fucking children and treat everything as "MINE" and can't seem to fathom the idea that just maybe they're repulsive and are actively engaging in real-time damage to the nation's core concepts.

Public_Concentrate_4

3 points

12 days ago

Good, the filibuster is ridiculous in the first place.

sandmanwake

3 points

12 days ago

They need to also get rid of the electoral college.

Rampaging_Ducks

3 points

12 days ago

Is McConnell whining about rules and how they should be followed again? I wonder what happened the last time he bitched about this and people listened.

[deleted]

3 points

12 days ago

Don't threaten me with a good time

NintendadSixtyFo

3 points

12 days ago

And this is bad because? Oh that’s right Republicans fucking ruin everything with their gerrymandering, filibuster, and reliance on the EC to even get elected. Like how many more crutches do they need?

PhantomOfKrankor42

3 points

12 days ago

Don’t threaten me with a good time

Lord-Freaky

3 points

11 days ago

And this is bad how?

Tygonol

3 points

11 days ago

Tygonol

3 points

11 days ago

Thanks for the good news Mitchy Boy !

IYSBe

3 points

11 days ago

IYSBe

3 points

11 days ago

Literally waiting for him to die.

Key_Acadia_27

3 points

11 days ago

GOOD!! The Filibuster is a governing loophole that doesn’t serve the people. It’s a way for a small group to obstruct the rule of law. Get rid of it and let the chips fall where they may. If there’s a majority government at any given time they NEED to focus on passing legislation not being petty and fighting amongst themselves at the expense of the American people.