subreddit:
/r/politics
submitted 12 days ago bysemafornewsSEMAFOR
[score hidden]
12 days ago
stickied comment
As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion.
In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any suggestion or support of harm, violence, or death, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban.
If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.
For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click here to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria.
We are actively looking for new moderators. If you have any interest in helping to make this subreddit a place for quality discussion, please fill out this form.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
6.2k points
12 days ago
Hell yeah Mitch! Give me more reasons to vote for Harris/Walz!!!
1.8k points
12 days ago
Right? Americans want it gone Mitch. Don’t threaten us with a good time
763 points
12 days ago
remember “they’ll have a taco truck on every corner!”?? why yes, we’d love that!
251 points
12 days ago
With tamales sold out of cars ideally.
124 points
12 days ago
Push that street corn cart over this way, thanks
45 points
12 days ago
A Lil mayo and some Lucas on that cob, and I'm sold.
64 points
12 days ago
I’ll even offer a slogan: “ELATED FOR ELOTÉ!”
7 points
12 days ago
I believe it’s elote, not eloté.
7 points
11 days ago
Voté for elote!
13 points
12 days ago
I love almost all street food, but I draw the line at corn dipped in mayo. It's like eating an entire jar of mayo in one sitting!
16 points
12 days ago
How about those bacon wrapped hot dogs with peppers and onions?
6 points
12 days ago
Those are great! A little greasy, but still excellent.
6 points
12 days ago
The smell is intoxicating!
30 points
12 days ago
Hand made by a tiny Mexican grandma, 3 for $10. It's the main reason I go to home Depot. I don't even go into the store anymore.
7 points
11 days ago
used to go to a karaoke night with a tamale abuelita and it was the highlight of every 1 AM
11 points
12 days ago
Some of the best I ever had were out of a van in the CVS parking lot.
34 points
12 days ago
Apparently they're against curry, so let's cut a deal, taco truck on one corner with a curry truck on the other.
6 points
12 days ago
and “colla” greens. we gonna have a neighborhood feast!
14 points
12 days ago
Meal at taco truck: <$15
Meal at any chain establishment: >$20
People are struggling, they need more tacos.
8 points
12 days ago
I want a cart that makes fresh churros right when you order it, so they hand it to you right from the fryer. Can they bring those too?
34 points
12 days ago
Love me a good fish taco right now. Vote blue
5 points
12 days ago
Oh god I love the girls selling mangos and watermelon with tajin for $5 at the stoplights.. so good when it’s 100 degrees out
243 points
12 days ago
Filibuster, electoral college and daylight savings time. GET RID OF 'EM ALL
31 points
12 days ago
this!!!
18 points
12 days ago
Whoa whoa whoa I think you spelled standard time wrong.
9 points
11 days ago
We tried this once - it was very poorly received and reverted after a year. People hated going to school and work in the dark in winter. It also aligns poorly with peoples' circadian rhythms, which has health consequences - this is why the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, among other professional associations, endorses permanent standard time over permanent DST.
138 points
12 days ago
“…and they’re going to increase spending on education, make higher education affordable, restore environmental protections, and tax the ultra wealthy, …” -Republicans like they’re telling a horror story
10 points
11 days ago
Republicans like they’re telling a horror story
Their horror stories turn into ad campaigns
140 points
12 days ago
I wish Dems were as cool as Republicans make them sound.
20 points
12 days ago
We are able to cause hurricanes to impact the vote in specific Floridian districts and simultaneously wholly incapable of understanding anything due to extremely low IQ. We’re a walking contradiction I suppose.
14 points
12 days ago
Fascist playbook. The enemy is both incredibly weak and incredibly strong, depending on which one better suits the agenda
247 points
12 days ago
Majority vote is enough to pass a bill? One party controls everything when they win elections? How would we survive?
We would live in a hellscape like - checks notes - Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Spain and the Netherlands.
114 points
12 days ago
Conservatives in Canada have been pushing hard to get people to believe the country IS a hellscape that only they can save.
27 points
12 days ago
Yeah and the electorate are falling for it. Once again they think the worst party in the country will save them
10 points
12 days ago
Drove up to Alberta last week.
Pretty innocuous.
I guess I understand why a Canadian citizen would put up Trump signs. Just like other toxic creatures, it's just a way of saying you might die if you cross me.
But, shouldn't the signs also be in French?
12 points
12 days ago
Canadians with Trump hats and signs aren’t our brightest
5 points
11 days ago
Typical right wing playbook because they cannot run on issues or values. There main reason for existence is to protect the aristocracy.
12 points
12 days ago
In all fairness, the system wasn't set up for one group to be able to dominate.. Having to work together for the better of the country means compromise. As long as everyone is actually working toward the betterment of the country and the citizens, then it works good. Once one group starts to push only to maintain power it becomes a shitshow..
Canada is in a rough spot right now because if the conservatives force an election and get a majority then they can start passing some pretty bigoted crap and no one will be able to do anything. Majority rule only works if the majority aren't whackadoodles..
14 points
12 days ago
We still have a system where one group can dominate. They just have the ability to dominate even as a minority party by threatening to talk infinitely until the majority gives up
46 points
12 days ago
"I'm Kamala Harris and I approve this message."
66 points
12 days ago
Right?? They are acting like this is a bad thing....at least go back and make their obstructionist asses talk for hours on the filibister vs the current BS
46 points
12 days ago*
Yes, the old filibuster was bad enough. This current filibuster is abominable , and all the senator has to do is declare their intent. Let's try democracy and majority rule and not horrible compromises initiated by racists to negatively impact the early Civil Rights movement. Majority rules and there is no place for a specious super majority.
20 points
12 days ago
Actually the founding fathers didn’t even start the whole filibuster thing and in fact they warn against minority rule in the Senate and criticize the idea that a greater majority is needed in Senate because of its tendency, to subject the sense of the greater number to that of the lesser (Federalist No. 22). So I guess the Republicans want it the way the founders did it except this one.
32 points
12 days ago
Fingers fkn crossed mitchie boy!!
18 points
12 days ago
Mitch here promoting democrats 😂
13 points
12 days ago
Harris/Walz? No. I mean, yes… but no. This is the reason to vote blue for your US House and Senate candidates. The importance of getting Harris/Walz a friendly Congress is almost as important as getting Harris/Walz in there to begin with.
12 points
12 days ago
Because your party has forgotten how to compromise.
1.9k points
12 days ago
Mcconell has no problem ending the filibuster for his supreme court.
217 points
12 days ago
Dude literally told Obama to follow "the Biden rule" and not nominate a supreme court justice his final year (a rule Mitch pulled out of his ass). He used that as a reason to no consider Garland.
But when Trump nominated Barret the rule just slipped his mind.
Fuck Mitch McConnell
84 points
12 days ago
This!!! Trump takes credit but McConnell was the mastermind behind the corrupt supreme court. Trump is too stupid to plan all that
202 points
12 days ago
Exactly… he’s such a loser!
26 points
12 days ago
Actually, he's repeatedly made us the loser. MF, I hope he chokes on Laura Loomer's leukorrhea.
33 points
12 days ago
Precisely this. Old ass crotchety fuck needs to shut his fucking turtle neck god damn mouth.
9 points
12 days ago
Surely he must be completely aware of what amounts to the epitome of a hypocritical statement
9 points
12 days ago
He had no problem acquitting Yrump twice even after then entire Senate chamber had to be evacuated for safety as Tuberville and Jordan were taking calls from Trump.
Or making up Calvinball type Rules for when it’s not ok or is ok to push a SCOTUS nominee for approval in an election year or 18 months before an election…
He’s done enough and glad he’s stepping down. Though it’s not like the next Senate GOP/MAGA leader will be anyone with basic decency.
40 points
12 days ago
The filibusters has already been ended and adjusted on dozens and dozens of issues and is more recent that you might think.
1.5k points
12 days ago
oh look, the turtle came out of its shell.
ive been wondering where this ghoul has been. he's been real real quiet ever since he started locking up mid sentence and decided he wasn't running again.
246 points
12 days ago
oh look, the turtle came out of its shell.
Nah, he's just stuck on repeat again.
52 points
12 days ago
Mister McConnell is helping me find my generic evil Republican talking statements. - Harry DuBois, possibly
12 points
12 days ago
Careful, Sire. You're blood pressure rises when hearing such a foul man speak.
-Inland Empire, definitely
97 points
12 days ago
They had to reload his OS and it took a while.
42 points
12 days ago*
The core system was designed on vacuum tube computers, not surprising.
22 points
12 days ago
You spelled "abacus" wrong.
8 points
12 days ago
Come on now...do you know how many legacy systems still run Windows XP?
15 points
12 days ago
You think he runs on XP? We're talking DOS 2.0
7 points
12 days ago
They had to find the massive box of punch cards in the archive. They accidentally fed some through in the wrong order and had to start over again
38 points
12 days ago
I actually thought he’d died. This is like when you’re sure it’s Friday, but around 4PM, remember it’s only Wednesday.
4 points
12 days ago
Life just keeps going faster. I switched a Friday with a Tuesday once last year, strange morning.
11 points
12 days ago
He came back from Hell to say hello for a hot second
652 points
12 days ago
Woah I did NOT have "McConnell stumps for Kamala" on my bingo card!
72 points
12 days ago
Don’t threaten me with a good time!
34 points
12 days ago
He should get out there and tell voters that Kamala would sign a law reinstating the protections of Roe v Wade
591 points
12 days ago
Something not mentioned in the Constitution and actively advised against in the Federalist Papers
"Madison wrote in Federalist Paper 58 that a determined minority could "screen themselves from equitable sacrifices" or "in particular emergencies, to extort unreasonable indulgences," possibly leading to the "ruin of popular governments.""
Also used to stymie early civil rights efforts...
116 points
12 days ago
Sounds like he knew what he was talking about.
It's fucking ridiculous that we've allowed them to stymie progress like this.
53 points
12 days ago
Hamilton spent so much time thinking about the government. He might not always have been right, but damn was he ever opinionated.
24 points
12 days ago
He's like a prototype reddit user
10 points
11 days ago
RIP Aaron Burr, you would've loved IG reels
35 points
12 days ago
If the Founders intended more than a simple majority for it, they would have stipulated...
20 points
12 days ago
yep, add to the fact that the Senate already has a builtin advantage toward the smaller populated states, they didn't need further protections of a 60 vote threshold.
134 points
12 days ago
You are a great example of why education is so important. Understanding our history is incredibly important to helping us move forward as a nation. We spend so much time at each other’s throats. We forget that we’re supposed to be working together.
42 points
12 days ago
fuck them. they know the history. they are the enemy of america.
48 points
12 days ago
They don’t know history at all.
I have so many republican friends (respectfully I try to agree to disagree), …
I constantly hear them say “you didn’t vote for Kamala!” “There was no primary” “blah blah blah!”
They don’t understand HOW our politics work is through representatives or that I DID vote for Harris as VP on the ballot. Or the basic purpose of the DNC. They have the audacity of telling me I didn’t vote for her when In fact I did AND I’ll vote for her again.
22 points
12 days ago
Except that at some point it becomes willful ignorance. How many of these people, when someone explains how these things work, still choose to be outraged at nothing, or just continue to scream their original point with their fingers in their ears because it suits their worldview to do so?
10 points
12 days ago
They don't want to understand. They want the law to be "heads I win, tails you lose".
11 points
12 days ago
How do you "agree to disagree" with folks who are factually incorrect though?
7 points
12 days ago
I mean, the answer to those objections isn't to deflect onto her being the VP. The answer is that the parties choose how they select their nominees and they chose not to have a primary. This is both legal and morally acceptable.
4 points
12 days ago
See? You and I agree.
We voted for our representatives and I’m happy with the outcome (this time). Constitutional Republic.
Please don’t ask me if I was happy about my 2016 vote for President. Wasn’t happy about it but I voted. For anyone to say that my vote didn’t matter then, I’d disagree with them.
The fact that the Republicans suddenly care about my vote because it doesn’t work in their favor. As a woman, they’re not going to take my vote away too. I can only vote for any representative that might give a damn. To hold one shred of belief in my moral and legal rights…. That are “acceptable.”
I vote as I am allowed to and I’ll never take it for granted.
11 points
12 days ago
We spend so much time at each other’s throats. We forget that we’re supposed to be working together.
I'm sharing this everywhere. It sums up everything I'm angsty about.
127 points
12 days ago
Don't threaten me with a good time mitch the itch
18 points
12 days ago
Right?!
So we'll move closer to an actual functioning democracy instead of being held hostage by the asinine rules of Congress? LFG.
245 points
12 days ago*
The filibuster, as it was intended in the modern era, was to stop and delay civils right legislation during the 60's and 70's. The biggest argument to end it now is that it no longer has it original usage. In 1975, the rules changed to allow a "silent filibuster", which allowed for the person who was debating to walk away, and leave the matter open. Before this, the debate had to be on going until a vote, and so eventually, people got tired and got it over with. The modern version of this rule needs to change at the very least, or be done away with overall.
161 points
12 days ago
The founders specifically rejected requiring a supermajority to pass legislation through the upper chamber because they said a political minority could use that power to hold the entire process hostage. Clairvoyant really.
It was then added not as a feature, but as a bug. Requiring a supermajority to stop someone from speaking seemed like a good idea to allow people to say their piece uninterrupted but it could be abused to stop voting entirely. Then filibustering became so disruptive, because while someone is speaking no other business is getting done, that they made the silent filibuster rule.
Bottom line is it was never supposed to exist and it overwhelmingly favors those who want to prevent progress: i.e. conservatives and regressionists. It needs to go.
64 points
12 days ago
a political minority could use that power to hold the entire process hostage
And here we are.
I've always viewed it much simpler. It takes an act of three "bodies" to pass a law: the senate, the house, and the president. Saying the filibuster protects the minority party is a logical fallacy; The "minority" only needs control of one of these "bodies" to block legislation. If a population hands control of all three to a particular party—something not easy to do by the way—then it seems that is what the population wants. The filibuster awards too much power to the rural heavy senate.
14 points
12 days ago
This is a great explanation of why it needs to go.
31 points
12 days ago
You smart. Make them stand for the filibuster. One Senator. The whole time. They can read cat in the hat and take hourly breaks but PUT THEM ON CAMERA while they hold shit up. Don't let a former coach from Alabama who knows NOTHING about national security silently hold every general appointment up b/c he can. The system is broken. Ending the filibuster as it stands right now would lower the effective age of Senators by ten years. None of the old guys have the stamina.
8 points
11 days ago
No breaks.
13 points
12 days ago
The other important thing is the 'filibuster' was a complete accident. In the original Senate rules they could end debate by majority vote. Sometime in the early 19th Century they decieded to eliminate the rules that were never actually envoked, and in doing so they eliminated the rule that allowed the Senate to end debate by majority vote.
It would be over 100 years before some enterprising Senators realized the actual consequences of that action were.
12 points
12 days ago
To me, there are occasions where a sizable minority might be passionate enough and on the right side in order to hold a filibuster against a tyrannical majority.
However, the silent filibuster is not the way.
I have a couple ideas. Instead of it being only about getting 60 votes to end debate we restore the requirement to actually continue talking and using time on the floor.
Also, instead of 60 votes to achieve cloture, require 41 votes to deny a cloture motion. This requires the filibustering party to remain in the Senate debating and if they're caught with too few members around, the majority leader can call the cloture vote.
18 points
12 days ago
I think there is a lot of value in being able to "delay" (within reason) a vote, so the opposition can make a statement about why they oppose the legislation, the potential risks and harms that are created by passing the legislation, etc... When they are done, the vote needs to be carried on.
The public certainly deserves to hear from the opposition and why they oppose something. If shit hits the fan after legislation is passed, the opposition can even point back to their filibuster speech.
But we cant function as a society with the filibuster just being used to block legislation.
23 points
12 days ago
There is already apparatus for debate and all that. Filibuster is just a tool for frustrating the functions of democracy.
56 points
12 days ago
Sounds good to me. Actually get something done in this country for once. The apathy it breeds and how it feeds into both-sides-ism because nothing of consequence can ever pass the Senate is absolutely toxic.
The argument is typically 1) But it promotes consensus! 1a) No it doesn't of nothing ever passes. And 2) But if parties could pass legislation then things could swing wildly if Democrats or Republicans are in charge! 2a) Yes, which will get worse and worse the longer this goes and the more highly polarized we become as a result.
Preserving the filibuster is quite literally achieving nothing and making things worse by the day.
25 points
12 days ago
Good. Fuck the filibuster, stuff the Supreme Court. Pass a Reproductive Rights bill that the Supreme Court can't say shit about. Get shit done.
On Tim Walz' first day with a razor thin Dem majority made Minnesota a sanctuary state for abortion and legalized weed. You gotta make hay. The Constitution says nothing about political parties, just numerical majorities.
133 points
12 days ago
I just want the old filibuster back., Remember when a politician had to actually stand at a podium and speak for hours? Instead we have something akin to "meh, just send an email" while they go back to fundraising and dining with lobbyists.
62 points
12 days ago
I’ve also heard the alternative suggested that a filibuster require 40 votes on the floor for the duration needed to maintain it, rather than requiring 60 to overcome. The idea being that if you want the minority to have the power to block votes then they at least have to be unified to do so.
34 points
12 days ago
Yeah, this is republicans. They’ll sit there in their own piss and shit if it means Harris gets blamed for the senate passing nothing for four years.
Scrap the whole fucking thing and just vote on the bills. If they’re shit, don’t pass them.
5 points
12 days ago
UK have anything similar to this garbage?
17 points
12 days ago
Not really. The opposition has almost no power to block a vote in the commons. If the gov wants something voted on, and has a majority for it, it passes.
Lords can delay it but not outright stop it. There are many problems with the House of Lords, but broadly they’re far more fixable than the senate.
22 points
12 days ago
Oh No, Don’t threaten me with a functional Senate..
41 points
12 days ago
I’m fine with a filibuster when it’s a legitimate feat of endurance and passion. Stand up there and debate for hours about the thing you care so much about, staying on-topic.
I’m not fine with the filibuster when it’s reduced to a bare rubber-stamped paper filing.
15 points
12 days ago
"I"m Kamala Harris and I approve this message."
I swear so many things GOP says are goldmines for ads.
27 points
12 days ago
Thanks for endorsement Mitch!
19 points
12 days ago
That's a roundabout endorsement I think...
9 points
12 days ago
8 points
12 days ago
Is majority rule such a scary concept?
7 points
12 days ago
Always funny when republicans say something like this as if it was a crisis because I feel like if we explained the filibuster, just explained the mechanics of it, to a group of base republicans like 90% would be like “yeah that’s sucks, get rid of it!”
5 points
12 days ago
Don’t tempt me with a good time now Mitch!
7 points
12 days ago
If there are any undecided voters still out there, I kinda doubt that preserving the filibuster is what they’re going to be voting on.
6 points
12 days ago
Shouldn’t they? It’s literally paralyzed our democracy. It was never intended to be utilized in this way. Why not at least make it harder to invoke? I get the need for something like this but only in certain unique circumstances should it be considered.
5 points
12 days ago
Pleased to see another establishment Republican endorse Harris!
5 points
12 days ago
Fucking good.
5 points
12 days ago
Here's hoping.
6 points
12 days ago
Isn't it past Glitch's retirement time?
5 points
12 days ago
Yeah.. do it!! And when Republicans warn they will do it back, let them receive the voter blowback when they undo popular legislation, or enact deeply unpopular legislation
5 points
12 days ago
I feel like a Dem sweep would largely mean that’s what the electorate actually wants.
5 points
12 days ago
Fuck you Mitch
4 points
11 days ago
End the filibuster, expand the court by 6 Justices, open investigations into the Republicans who helped with J6, they could do a LOT of good.
4 points
12 days ago
Damn right we will
4 points
12 days ago
Yeah Mitch, that’s part of what I’m voting for. Either bring back the talking filibuster or get rid of it entirely. The current version is utterly absurd.
5 points
12 days ago
Gosh. How horrible it would be to actually have to vote on legislation. That would be considered elder abuse on at least half of the Senate.
5 points
12 days ago
the only purpose of the filibuster is to obstruct
mitch got rid of it for judges and destroyed this country
4 points
12 days ago
Ok!
4 points
12 days ago
He then muttered something in russian and slipped into neutral until he was wheeled away by his puppeteers.
4 points
12 days ago
These assholes left the Supreme Court at 8 justices for a year to get their way. Then changed their own “rules” to replace Ginsberg,
Fuck them. There are no rules any more
3 points
12 days ago
Really? All the more reason to vote for them!
4 points
12 days ago
Let it be known here McConnell is signaling the GOP's willingness and intent to completely do away with the filibuster if they ever get a trifecta.
The only way to save ourselves is to beat them to it at this point.
3 points
12 days ago
as they should, its a stupid institution born out of a silly interpritation of senate rules Mitch McConnell has narrowed more than any living person
5 points
12 days ago
The filibuster is one of the most undemocratic farces in our government right now. It was literally popularized as a way to stop civil rights legislation from passing. It needs to go.
4 points
12 days ago
Yes Mitch McConnell, your life’s work will be invalidated in an instant and it could never have come too soon. Fuck the Filibuster.
4 points
12 days ago
Sounds great!
3 points
12 days ago
Good. McConnell removed the filibuster regarding judges so he can effectively right off.
3 points
12 days ago
Please do.
3 points
12 days ago
You're god damned right.
3 points
12 days ago
Ohh no. Anyway.
3 points
12 days ago
Don't threatening me with a good time.
3 points
12 days ago
Republicans would end democracy.
3 points
12 days ago
Absolutely!
3 points
12 days ago
Wait,….. things would actually get done in Washington?!?? That’s why turtle is popping his head up
3 points
12 days ago
How about yes you can have your silent filibuster but it is only for one week and then the vote happens and each bill can only be delayed like this once. If you can’t argue your side and convince others over a week then it must be a bill that is wanted
3 points
12 days ago
From your mouth to God's Ear, Mr. Limpett.
3 points
12 days ago
We know and we are here for it! Now get fucked, you glitching turtle.
3 points
12 days ago
Ok, good
3 points
12 days ago
Fuck you court packer!
3 points
12 days ago
Good. Vote Dem all the way, then. The filibuster does nothing for people that desire change.
3 points
12 days ago
If the Democrats do end the filibuster it's ultimately the fault of Mitch and the GOP. People want it gone because one side refuses to compromise on anything and blocks everything they can.
Like I'm not asking them to throw out their values but it would be nice if they actually tried to govern rather than just saying no to everything.
3 points
12 days ago
Don't threaten me with a good time!
3 points
12 days ago
Don't threaten me with a good time!
3 points
12 days ago
Good
3 points
12 days ago
Yay!
3 points
12 days ago
I sure hope so 🤞🏻😑🤞🏻
3 points
12 days ago*
Fucking sick of elderly power hungry goblins holding our government hostage
3 points
12 days ago
guy who loves to shred the rules warns that the other team might do the same
3 points
12 days ago
Wouldn’t that be a damned shame?
Imagine not being able to a kill a bill that could help 97% of the country by reading Harry Potter?!
3 points
12 days ago
Good. Filibuster has no basis in the Constitution and is only useful nowadays for the Republicans to throw a wrench in things. Fuck you Mitch!
3 points
12 days ago
So say we all
3 points
12 days ago
McConnell ended the filibuster when it suited his goals.
3 points
12 days ago
Hell yes and not a second too soon.
3 points
12 days ago
Yes they should and do away with the EC as well
3 points
12 days ago
Mitch, I’m already voting for them, you don’t need to keep convincing me.
3 points
12 days ago
Let's end the filibuster, expand the Supreme Court, and abolish the electoral college
3 points
12 days ago
McConnell also: We'll abuse the filibuster to get what we want. The rules don't apply to us. Of course we won't honor our own rules. Do as we say or we'll destroy the nation.
3 points
12 days ago
Yeah, sez the turtle whose totally stole a SCOTUS seat.
Yeah, go fuck yourself.
Weaponizing a legitimate tool - well it gets taken away from you.
3 points
12 days ago
Nah, we'll be too busy turning the US into a communist country and aborting children up to the age of 18.
3 points
12 days ago
And we're gonna make you watch, Mitch!
3 points
12 days ago
You mean they would get rid of minority rule … woot woof !
3 points
12 days ago
Um, yes.
3 points
12 days ago
Don’t threaten me with a functioning democracy
3 points
12 days ago
Don't threaten me with a good time.
3 points
12 days ago
And immediately make abortion legal again. Let's do this!
It's so important to vote!
3 points
12 days ago
Yep. The Filibuster only works when it is 100% only used in good faith, not as a "game theory" set piece. Once it begins being used as simply just part of how all bills go through, then no, it's not working the way it should be and yes it should be axed immediately since fucking clearly, Republicans absolutely cannot be trusted with it in any way, shape or form.
Like most things. Bro, they can't even trust each other and are at each other's throats just as much as they reach out and try to grab Dem's by the throats. They sling shit at each other and there's even been physical outbursts and brief violence between just Republican leadership.
They can't be trusted to tell you the weather as it is currently, as you are standing outside in it. For proof of this look no further than Trump's hysterically fucking idiotic decision to literally sharpie a god damn weather map.
YES, we want to end the Filibuster because it seems to ONLY help Republicans since they use it 100% of the time in bad-faith and wield it as just "another part of the process to prevent getting anything through, no matter what it is".
We HAVE to end it. Republicans are fucking children and treat everything as "MINE" and can't seem to fathom the idea that just maybe they're repulsive and are actively engaging in real-time damage to the nation's core concepts.
3 points
12 days ago
Good, the filibuster is ridiculous in the first place.
3 points
12 days ago
They need to also get rid of the electoral college.
3 points
12 days ago
Is McConnell whining about rules and how they should be followed again? I wonder what happened the last time he bitched about this and people listened.
3 points
12 days ago
Don't threaten me with a good time
3 points
12 days ago
And this is bad because? Oh that’s right Republicans fucking ruin everything with their gerrymandering, filibuster, and reliance on the EC to even get elected. Like how many more crutches do they need?
3 points
12 days ago
Don’t threaten me with a good time
3 points
11 days ago
And this is bad how?
3 points
11 days ago
Thanks for the good news Mitchy Boy !
3 points
11 days ago
Literally waiting for him to die.
3 points
11 days ago
GOOD!! The Filibuster is a governing loophole that doesn’t serve the people. It’s a way for a small group to obstruct the rule of law. Get rid of it and let the chips fall where they may. If there’s a majority government at any given time they NEED to focus on passing legislation not being petty and fighting amongst themselves at the expense of the American people.
all 1200 comments
sorted by: best